"We see, in many a land, the proudest dynasties and tyrannies still crushing, with their mountain weight, every free motion of the Consciences and hearts of men. We see, on the other hand, the truest heroism for the right and the greatest devotion to the Truth in hearts that God has touched. We have a work to do, as great as our forefathers and, perhaps, far greater. The enemies of Truth are more numerous and subtle than ever and the needs of the Church are greater than at any preceding time. If we are not debtors to the present, then men were never debtors to their age and their time. Brethren, we are debtors to the hour in which we live. Oh, that we might stamp it with Truth and that God might help us to impress upon its wings some proof that it has not flown by neglected and unheeded." -- C.H. Spurgeon . . . "If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:31, 32 . . . . . Our Website is UNDER CONSTRUCTION, please be patient!

HTML

BOOKMARK AND SHARE

Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 10, 2020

THE MARXIST AGENDA: Introduction - "Our Nation Is Divided"

posted by A.M. Kisly

Our nation is divided. 


This past week, we celebrated our nation's birth and independence. We truly have so  much to be grateful for. 

So why then is there so much division, hatred?  Why do so many desire to destroy our Constitution and dismantle our government, and every aspect of civil society?


What is going on?

This can only be answered from a biblical view.

Our nation was founded upon Christian principles. 
Americans shouldn't simply forget about their country’s Christian roots. Anyone interested in an accurate account of the nation’s past cannot afford to ignore the important influence of faith on many Americans, from the Puritans to the present day.

Christian ideas underlie some key tenets of America’s constitutional order. For instance, the Founders believed that humans are created in the image of God, which led them to design institutions and laws meant to protect and promote human dignity. Because they were convinced that humans are sinful, they attempted to avoid the concentration of power by framing a national government with carefully enumerated powers. As well, the Founders were committed to liberty, but they never imagined that provisions of the Bill of Rights would be used to protect licentiousness. And they clearly thought moral considerations should inform legislation.

America has drifted from these first principles, yet we would do well to reconsider the wisdom of them.

We ignore at our peril the Founders’ insight that the democratic process requires a moral people and that faith is an important, if not indispensable, support for morality. Such faith may well flourish best without government support, but it should not have to flourish in the face of government hostility.


Today these principles are rejected by a godless society that refuses the revealed moral will of God's law and His commandments.  As a result, w
e are seeing the death of morality, biblical standards, and the displacement of Christianity. They simply want to do away with God and Christianity!  As these begin to fade, so does every semblance of sanity and decency in society. 

These moral issues are the dividing factor.  The words of Jesus have never had more meaning. “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand” (Matt. 12:25). Those who fully understand the impact of the Lord’s words can see that the clouds which are all around us, are just a foretaste of the coming storm.


We are divided ideologically, politically, morally and spiritually. We understand that the
 worldview of a people will determine its private morals, and its form of society.
The evidence of our decaying society clearly tells the path we are on.

As our Christian foundation crumbles, so does the restraints of wickedness, freedom will continue to disintegrate.

In looking to our past, there is another interesting point to be made regarding the Pilgrim's and their failed Commonwealth system, a form of Communism.   Their ability to conquer hunger and poverty was not in relying upon the charitable hand outs of the Indians, nor in continuing on in the failed system of communal living, but in the decision to embrace private property ownership. 

Plymouth property was communally owned and cultivated, a breeding ground for poverty, and despondency.  The injustice felt by those who were paid the same wage as those who could not work created discontentment.  Women felt that their communal chores were on a par with slavery.  The few carrying the load for the many became burdensome and not profitable. Not able to produce enough to sustain themselves and on the brink of starvation and extermination, the Colony's leaders changed course allotting a parcel of land to each settler. As a result, private ownership of farmland provided self-sufficiency and success.

"The famine that nearly wiped out the Pilgrims in 1623 gave way to a period of agricultural abundance that enabled the Massachusetts settlers to set down permanent roots in the New World, prosper, and play an indispensable role in the ultimate success of the American experiment."  - Michael Franc, The Heritage Foundation.

This article is an introduction to a new series called, "The Marxist Agenda."  In this series we will take a look at the history, the ideology, and the spirituality of godless men who have so significantly influenced the world with a GREAT BIG LIE!

The war rages, and the stakes are high.  
Every Christian must prepare, and understand the nature of the battle.  It is a spiritual battle,  and it is coming with great intensity!  

None of us could have ever imagined that we would see our great nation fall into such chaos, that anti-Americans would be elected to government offices. That they would be calling for the destruction of our Constitution, the overthrow of our government, and the values we hold dear.  The indoctrination of Marxist ideology has so permeated society through State education and universities, that I am convinced this road leads to the  destruction of America and our freedoms.

To men and women of faith, scripture tells us in Ephesians 6:12, that "we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."  While we are in a battle, we are encouraged that God uses all things for our good.  He is
 building His Church, and  He has assured us that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it!  Matthew 16:18. 

Regardless of the horrendous changes taking place in our nation and around the globe, we have a future and a hope, the hope of heaven.  Our lives here are but a vapor, and eternity awaits.  Let's keep that in perspective.

In this series, we will uncover the who, what, when, why and how of the Marxist Revolution and where it is leading us - a global new world.  It is a world long in the making, with a false one world system of government, religion, and economy, and a false sense of hope and peace. 

It is what the bible has so clearly warned us about, the things that will happen before Jesus returns as Righteous Judge and King!


Let's begin:



Cultural and Neo-Marxism is one of the main sources of confusion in our world.  What we see being played out in our communities, in our streets and around the globe is the evidence of that.  While Marxism has largely disappeared from the workers' movement, Marxist theory flourishes today in cultural institutions, in the academic world, as well as in mass media.

Most Americans are keenly aware that something strange is happening in our country, but are frustrated that they can't quite put a finger on it.  Well that's what this series of articles are about, putting the pieces of the puzzle together for a clear picture of what is going on, and why it is happening.  


Today there are individuals, groups, institutions, and foreign agencies working in unison to overthrow our constitutional form of government, and replace it with Neo-Marxism...or worse. To answer the question as to why, we must discuss how it infiltrated America.
So how did we get here? It has been in the making for decades. The manifestations of revolution have been presenting itself since the foundation was laid in America back in 1933.

The Frankfort Institute

Brannon Howse writes, "In 1933 a group of “intellectuals” from Germany, formed a Marxist Institute. (The Frankfurt School Followed: Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.)  Not being able to use the term Marxism, they hid it under a more benign name. Remember, by 1933, Hitler had risen to power. Many of these intellectuals were of Jewish descent, and decided that it was time to get out of Germany. It was John Dewey, the father of Modern Education in America, who took the opportunity to bring these German intellectuals to America, and place them in leading institutions (Berkley, Brandeis, Princeton, Columbia and other places) to implement what we know today to be Cultural Marxism."
There are a lot of names in this group, and some of those names you may recognize.  Let's take a look at a few: 

Marcuse, Herbert (1898-1979)
German-born U.S. political philosopher whose combination of Marxism and Freudian psychology was popular for a time among student radicals in the late 1960s.
Having become a member of the Social Democratic Party while a student at the University of Freiburg, Marcuse joined the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research in 1932 and became its most widely read spokesperson. He fled to Geneva in 1933 when Hitler came to power, then went to the United States in 1934, where he taught at Columbia University and became a US citizen in 1940. His Reason & Revolution, written in 1941, made an important contribution to the understanding of Hegel and his influence on Marx.
An intelligence analyst for the U.S. Army during World War II, he headed the Central European Section of the Office of Intelligence Research after the war. He returned to teaching in 1951 at Columbia and Harvard, Brandeis University (1954-65), and the University of California at San Diego (1965-76), where after retirement he was honorary emeritus professor of philosophy until his death.
A Hegelian-Freudian-Marxist, Marcuse highlighted the cultural forms of repression and the role of technology and the expansion of the production of consumer goods in the maintenance of the stability of capitalism. Marcuse observed that Post-War prosperity had managed to keep the masses intellectually and spiritually captive and his later works are permeated with pessimism. Although a open critic of the established order, Marcuse did not applaud the 1968 demonstrations by students, many of whom were his readers, believing the demonstrations to be misguided: “I still consider the American University an oasis of free speech and real critical thinking in the society,” he said. “Any student movement should try to protect this citadel . . . [but] try to radicalize the departments inside the university.”
Among his major writings are Reason and Revolution (1941), Eros and Civilisation (1955), One-Dimensional Man (1964) and Studies in Critical Philosophy (1972).

See: Herbert Marcuse Archive

Horkheimer, Max (1895-1973)
German philosopher and social scientist; director of the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research 1930-1958; close associate of Theodor Adorno, who mixed Marxism with influences as diverse as Schopenhauer, Dilthey, Nietzsche and Freud.
The Institute for Social Research was founded in 1923 by Felix Weil to be an independent academy for Marxism intended to rival any University in the standards of scholarship, and the institute carried out important research on the history and condition of the German workers' movement. It was possibly the first body to use opinion polls as a research tool.
Others to be associated with the Institute as well as Horkheimer and Adorno included Leo Lowenthal, Raymond Aron, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin and Ernst Krenek.
After the 1923 defeat of the German Revolution, Horkheimer and other members of the Institute to some degree, drew the conclusion that the working class could never be the vehicle for social change simply as a result of its position within the production process, and concluded that only the development of theory itself could be the scene of liberation. Horkheimer co-authored Dialectic of Enlightenment with Theodor Adorno while in the US during the 1940s, and his 1947 Critique of Instrumental Reason is also widely read. In 1949, Horkheimer returned to Frankfurt and re-established the Institute, and retired to Switzerland in 1958.

See: Marx Horkheimer Archive.

Adorno, Theodor (1903 - 1969)
German philosopher who also wrote on sociology, psychology, and musicology.
Adorno obtained a degree in philosophy from Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt in 1924. His early writings, which emphasize aesthetic development as important to historical evolution, reflect the influence of Walter Benjamin's application of Marxism to cultural criticism. After teaching two years at the University of Frankfurt, Adorno immigrated to England in 1934 to escape the Nazi persecution of the Jews. He taught at the University of Oxford for three years and then went to the United States (1938), where he worked at Princeton (1938-41) and then was co-director of the Research Project on Social Discrimination at the University of California, Berkeley (1941-48). Adorno and his colleague Max Horkheimer returned to the University of Frankfurt in 1949. There they rebuilt the Institute for Social Research and revived the Frankfurt school of critical theory, which contributed to the German intellectual revival after World War II.
One of Adorno's themes was civilization's tendency to self-destruction, as evinced by Fascism. In their widely influential book Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), Adorno and Horkheimer located this impulse in the concept of reason itself, which the Enlightenment and modern scientific thought had transformed into an irrational force that had come to dominate not only nature but humanity itself. The rationalization of human society had ultimately led to Fascism and other totalitarian regimes that represented a complete negation of human freedom. Adorno concluded that rationalism offers little hope for human emancipation, which might come instead from art and the prospects it offers for preserving individual autonomy and happiness. Adorno's other major publications are Philosophy of Modern Music (1949), The Authoritarian Personality (1950, with others), Negative Dialectics (1966), and Aesthetic Theory (1970).

See: Theodor Adorno Archive

Fromm, Erich (1900-1980)
German-born U.S. psychoanalyst and social philosopher who explored the interaction between psychology and society. By applying Freudian principles to the social problems, Fromm hoped to show the way to a psychologically balanced "sane society."
After receiving his Ph.D. from the University of Heidelberg in 1922, Fromm trained in psychoanalysis at the University of Munich and at the Psycho-Analytic Institute of Berlin. He began practicing psychoanalysis as a disciple of Sigmund Freud but soon took issue with Freud's preoccupation with unconscious drives and consequent neglect of the role of societal factors in human psychology. Fromm had already attained a distinguished reputation as a psychoanalyst when he left Nazi Germany in 1933 for the United States, where he came into conflict with orthodox Freudian psychoanalytic circles. From 1934 to 1941, Fromm was on the faculty of Columbia University, where his views became increasingly controversial. In 1941, he went to Bennington College, Vermont, and in 1951 was appointed Professor of Psychoanalysis at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City. In 1962, he returned to the US to take up the position of Professor of Psychiatry at New York University.
In his early work in Germany, Fromm argued that an understanding of the psychological needs of human beings was essential in order to build a healthy society, and he put these ideas forward in several books and articles on the development of Christianity. In Fromm's first major work, Escape from Freedom (1941), he charted the growth of human freedom and self-awareness from the Middle Ages to modern times and, using psychoanalytic techniques, analysed the tendency of modern emancipated man to take refuge from his new insecurities by turning to totalitarian movements such as Nazism. See Fear of Freedom, from the same period.
In The Sane Society (1955), Fromm presented his argument that modern man has become alienated and estranged from himself within consumer-oriented industrial society and called for a rebirth of enlightenment to allow each person to fulfil his individual needs while maintaining bonds of social fraternity.

See Erich Fromm Archive.

Of this group, there was also Friedrich Pollock, another one of the founders of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt am Main, and a member of the Frankfurt School of neo-Marxist theory.  The group’s emigration to New York, where Columbia offered a loose institutional affiliation, similar to that in Frankfurt. As the Institute members left the old continent, they conceived of their American purpose as becoming an island of German radical thought.

The members of the Frankfurt Institute tried to develop a theory of society that was based on Marxism and Hegelian philosophy but which also utilized psychoanalysis, sociology, existential philosophy, and other disciplines. They used basic Marxist concepts to analyze the social relations within capitalist economic systems. This approach, which became known as “critical theory,” yielded influential critiques of large corporations and monopolies, the role of technology, the industrialization of culture, and the decline of the individual within capitalist society.

See Link: Critical Theory

They did not use the term Cultural Marxism, they were of course Neo-Marxists, and used the term “Political Correctness.” Professor Frank Ellis at the University of Sheffield noted the term “political correctness” was first used in the late 19th to the early 20th century when Vladimir Lenin began his rise to power. Ellis said that Marxist-Leninists and Maoists placed a heavy preeminence on being ideologically correct, both politically and theoretically. Essentially, a “forum for discussion,” as Ellis described it, would impede the revolutionary spirit needed to upend the social order.

Consider 20th century Europe, where the Frankfurt School was born in Germany. As pointed out by author William Lind, it was the intellectuals, such as Georg Lukacs, who believed culture needed to be rooted out before it could be replaced by a Marxist one. To do so, “critical theory” came to fruition with the goal of destroying what it perceived to be old ways of thinking.

And what primary "old worldview" does Marxism want to get rid of?
JEREMIAH 6:16-17 
"Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken."
While the Right is dedicated to tradition of Judeo/Christian values, the Left is committed to egalitarianism by upending the social order. The upheaval of the 1960s is a perfect example. The New Left was born and its intellectuals began promoting anti-American hysteria and an all-out revolt against sexual norms.

In later years, these very intellectuals would stock college campuses as professors and become the antecedents for the very people promoting multiculturalism, diversity, and “safe spaces.” Writing in Censorship: A World Encyclopedia in 2001, Robert Burt wrote that the introduction of political correctness to the American scene began with these very New Left intellectuals.



Back to Brannon Howse - he continues,
Their goal was to go after two American institutions:
1. Education
2. Media
They understood that if they could take these two institutions alone, and use them to promote Neo-Marxist values, they could change the entire conduct, and worldview of a nation. They knew that your worldview determines your values. Your values are the foundation of your conduct.
If they could get a nation to embrace Marxist ideas in their values, eventually they could get them to embrace it in their conduct. This is the start of a Cultural Revolution with Political Correctness.
Back to Herbert Marcuse, one of the Founders of the Frankfort Institute, he coined the phrase, “Make Love, Not War!” This was the mantra of the 60’s with the counter cultural revolution protesters. Herbert Marcuse, the revolutionary theorist, said that the "old way" of revolution is old fashioned, and that the "new way" of revolution would be a diffused and dispersed disintegration of the system. How? Using media and education, they would destroy the traditional Judeo/Christian values of America, and our Constitutional Republic along with it. Education and media would be the goal.
In the process, they said they will implement such things as feminism, multiculturalism, tolerance (and much more) as part of their educational process.

Well, without dispute, there is an escalated shift in America and in our culture. We are all seeing it, and many are trying to fight it. The inroads of atheistic and Marxist thought has long been known, frankly, as detailed strategies come forth relative to how they’ve intended to collapse our nation from within and how they have implemented their strategies to cross-direct our institutions from education to colleges to K-12 to Hollywood to media to politics.

Not only have these institutions been targeted and infiltrated by Marxist political and economic thought, so has the church in America. You say, “Really?” Yes, the church in America. This is perhaps more alarming than the others because if you can turn moral truth and Biblical teachings into a political tool for a counterfeit teaching and turn the church and the pulpit from the clear teaching of the Gospel and clear Biblical instruction into a weapon to undermine freedom, God and truth, then the last bulwark for the defense of truth is lost. (More on this in an upcoming article.)
What is the Marxist Goal?

Brannon continues, 
The Marxist goal is to replace American values with Global values. What are they? Open Boarders, Redistribution of Wealth, Population Control, Elimination of Private Property Rights, Individualism, and Radical Environmentalism, that elevates nature over man. In order for these values to be successfully inculcated to the worldview of Americans, The obstacle of strong families, communities and institutions, led by patriotic American men of courage and convictions must be destroyed. So what we are seeing is toxic masculinity, white privilege, and racism. These are the tools being used to SHAME patriotic Americans into surrendering their values and convictions, in order to avoid being marginalized, characterized and vilified.
Because Americans did not fully fight the Marxist infiltration in our own nation, but rather allowed Marxist intellectuals to teach in our education system, we have literally taught our own children anti-American and anti-Christ values, and have strengthen our foes.  Thus we have a Marxist Revolution materializing before our eyes.

One must wonder why this was so.

The following couple of videos brings some light as to why. The first video, with Professor Antony Sutton, is an interesting presentation which shows American capitalists financing Hitler, as well as Bolshiveks.

These are the thesis and anti-thesis to form the synthesis of what the one world government will look like: Communitarianism.

See Links:

  1. The Best Enemies Money Can Buy: An Interview with Prof. Antony C. Sutton
  2. G. Edward Griffin on Leninism and Fabianism
Marxist ideology has spread throughout the world. It has in fact saturated every institution in society, and destroying our nation from within. We have plenty of outside enemies, but our greatest enemy has become our own.

Since the end of World War II, America has not only increasingly surrendered to Marxists here, but willingly surrendered to them in Eastern Europe, China North Korea, and Vietnam, thus empowering our enemies exponentially. In some cases, the U.S. is actually funding their regimes. Our enemies in this world are looking at us as a nation of fools!

Compromise always leads to our enemies advancing, and our demise.  The same can be said spiritually speaking. Spiritual Compromise will always strengthen our enemy and weaken our faith.


The Enemy Within

In the past few months, we have all seen state leaders abuse their power and authority, using the Covid19 outbreak. While apparently trying to protect society from the spread of the disease, shutting down the entire nation, we witnessed the unimaginable overstep of government into our lives, endless scolding's and shame parades.  While at first we all agreed that this was in the best interest of everyone,  we soon saw what emergency powers looked like in the hands of radical Socialists, hypocrisy at it's finest.

Then there was the horrifying tragedy of George Floyd, and the anger that arose from pretty much everyone.  But when Marxist organizations such as Black Lives Matter went from so-called "peaceful protests" to "revolution" and by any means necessary, we were dumbfounded by government leaders and their absolute refusal to stop the chaos and violence. 

In the midst of a pandemic, tens of thousands took to the streets, burning, looting, and destroying businesses, and communities not to mention the violent beatings and murders that were committed.  Confused by government leaders refusal to bring peace and order, we became outraged at their using their position to provoke and instigate riots and social unrest.  To many, we felt abandoned, vulnerable and unprotected.

Governors started releasing prisoners. Violent criminals were released back into communities in less than 24 hours.  Who was being victimized?  Law abiding American citizens.


Why? 

Because Neo-Marxist revolutionaries hold government offices as well.  They may call themselves Democrats or Socialists...but they all share the same ideology.

Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar said the American economy and political systems need to be “dismantled,” not just the criminal justice system.

“As long as our economy and political systems prioritize profit without considering who is profiting, who is being shut out, we will perpetuate this inequality,” she said at a livestreamed event in Minnesota on Tuesday. “We cannot stop at [the] criminal justice system. We must begin the work of dismantling the whole system of oppression.”

See: Ilhan Omar Calls For ‘Dismantling’ American Economy And Political System


Government leaders not only allow our streets and communities to be terrorized, a Seattle city to be seiged (CHAD autonomous zone), a heavily armed Black Militant Group (NFAC) to terrorize guests at Stone Mountain Park in Georgia on July 4th demanding land for the “New Black Nation”, but support it.

Even Park officials called the heavily armed Black Militant Group (NFAC) a peaceful protest. 


See: Armed group at Stone Mountain on July 4 

NFAC's leader Grand Master Jay describing how he will build his black ethnostate inside the United States.

By the way, what happened to Democrat Socialists demand for gun control?????  Hypocrisy!


Peaceful protesters carry placards, not weapons. A heavily armed militant group demanding the state of Texas for a “New Black Nation” or else, is not a peaceful protest. A heavily armed militant group seeking confrontation with white supremacists is not a peaceful protest. A heavily armed militant group calling out all rednecks to face them on the field of battle is not a peaceful protest. A heavily armed militant group carrying their weapons in military fashion does not comply with the “Concealed Carry” laws. So why is this considered a peaceful protest?

In spite of the hundreds of horrifying criminal events called “peaceful protests” government leaders are defunding our police departments. If you are a rational thinker, you  have got to be wondering about the mental stability of some government leaders.

Let me reiterate, your worldview determines your values, and your values are the foundation of your conduct.  Look at their conduct, what values do you see?  A worldview that produces immorality and violence is evil.

From Elementary Schools to Higher Education to Community Leadership and Federal Offices - we are watching Marxist ideology taught and being carried out in our land.

While all of these unlawful acts are taking place and our leaders have allowed to happen, at the very same time were punishing law abiding citizens who simply wanted to open their business, provide for their families and their communities.  Letter's of cease and desist were sent out to small business owners and churches.  While criminals were set free, they locked up business owners for opening a day early.  The hauled away pastors for opening their church, even while observing social distance guidelines.  Yes, GUIDELINES, NOT LAW.

Despite the ban on social gatherings in NYC, Mayor De Blasio allows BLM protests to continue.  He even joined them painting a city street in front of the Trump Tower.

See:  De Blasio allows BLM marches despite ban on mass gatherings

Adding insult to injury, churches and religious groups have been singled out during the Covid19 outbreak….even now, in the State of California, the governor has banned Worship in Church.

Why? 


We are now witnessing the next wave of the destruction and breakdown of US society–Christian churches are the latest target by the godless left.

The CDC blames Christian Churches for the outbreak of Covid 19.

In a recent White House "Prayer Call" to faith leaders, Jill Noble reported that,
Dr. Deborah Birx came on for the purpose of sharing her guidelines to the faith community. Several weeks into the Covid outbreak, she is discussing social distance guidelines with these leaders, claims that the primary group responsible for the largest outbreak of Covid was the faith community. Yeah, you heard that right.  What an absolute shameless lie!

Here's the problem with that, the faith community has not even been allowed to gather until very recently, and that is on a very limited basis. So the blatant lie here is to damage the faith community and use Covid as an excuse to keep us from gathering. 

This past weekend the mob targeted a Troy, New York Church. A BLM mob attacked Christians on the steps of the church and interrupted the sermon screaming profanities. The BLM mob was screaming “We’re not here for violence!” as they dragged parishioners from the church steps! The violent mob then went inside and screamed “Black Lives Matter!” during the sermon.

See Link: Godless BLM Protest Mob Targets NY Church – Attacks Christians on Church Steps, Including Mother with Baby, Shouts Down Pastor Screaming “Black Lives Matter” During Sermon (VIDEO)

All of this....ALL OF IT is part of The Marxist Agenda for taking down America. If you don’t know that, then it’s time to listen and learn. 


Who Is Funding These Organizations?

We are looking at how these groups are funded. They are made possible by the tacit consent of Democratic mayors and governors, and funded by rich and powerful globalist men like George Soros, wealthy elites, and major corporate sponsors. George Soros now 89 years old, continues to funnel his billions towards the internal destruction of America.

George Soros (born August 12, 1930) is an anti-Semitic atheist, international financier and con artist who bankrolled the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, among other left-wing causes. Soros' organization, the Open Society Foundations, is responsible for financing postmodernist, Neo-Marxist organizations for his personal gain. The Open Society Foundation devotes $2.6 billion to advance left-wing Social Justice warrior priorities which in reality promote feminism, Islam, illegal drugs, prostitution, and homosexuality.

Soros is a naturalized American citizen, born in Hungary where he worked for the Nazis as a teenager, fingering and looting his compatriot Jews.

Soros uses his billions of dollars to influence government politics. Soros is known for funding organizations opposed to sovereignty, national borders, and supportive of a one-world government.

Because of his illegal insurrectionist activities, financial manipulations and funding and support of criminal activity in the numerous countries in which he has interests, Soros and his organizations have been officially banned from six of them under penalty of law. Those countries are the Philippines, Russia, Turkey, Poland, Pakistan and his native Hungary.

See Link: George Soros

How can we come to any other conclusion when we listen to his own words when he spoke at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland? We can track his funding of American political races. His hatred towards President Donald Trump, capitalism and the American way is breath taking. More dangerous than words is his ability to fund extreme leftist causes, his Open Society Foundations that he runs. The revolution the Left has longed dreamed about is now a reality, and the murder of George Floyd was the perfect cover to launch it from.

For all the outrage over Russian interference in our elections by MSN media and Democrat politicians, where is the outrage over the billions of dollars coming in under the radar by anti-American George Soros, whose influences go deep into America’s politics, culture and education? 


An article written by Cheryl Chumley in The Washington Times, she reveals the following:
In the last few years, Soros has taken to trying to take over local law enforcement agencies by pumping massive amounts of money into candidates he favors in key district attorney races.
“George Soros’ quiet overhaul of the US justice system,” Politico reported, way back in August of 2016.
It continues in present day.
“PAC funded by George Soros pumps nearly $1 million into local races for prosecutor,” The Washington Post reported in June, about the money from the Justice and Public Safety PAC that went to the left-leaners of both Arlington County, Virginia, and Fairfax County, Virginia, commonwealth’s attorney races.’
“Soros Adds Intrigue and $800,000 to D.A. Race, Backing Progressive,” The New York Times reported in November.
The district attorney’s office is one of the first local lines of defense of the Constitution and the rule of law. That means the potential for immediate progressive impact is huge — and it’s an impact that can be had without all that costly political fighting over, say, a senator’s seat, or a Supreme Court slot.
Buying D.A. seats gives you good bang for the buck, in other words. And oftentimes, quietly, unbeknownst to those who might oppose.
That doesn’t mean Soros isn’t busily buying into congressional races, too. or the media. Or — and this, particularly in recent months — the grassroots.
Democracy Alliance, a nonprofit founded in 2005 to advance a progressive vision throughout America, and funded by wealthy elites, recently shifted its charitable giving strategy from think tanks in high-powered Washington, D.C., to small, mostly unknown groups in various communities. Why?
Call it — once again — under-the-radar influence.
Politico in 2018 described the process: “Kevin Rodriguez, a 19-year-old aspiring singer in tight jeans and gray-and-white Nike high tops, had never heard of the powerful progressive donor group Democracy Alliance. But he is a key part of the secretive billionaire club’s plot to flip the Sun Belt. The donor clique, which counts George Soros and Tom Steyer among its members, is quietly giving funds to a handful of local grassroots groups like Rodriguez’s employer, Living United for Change in Arizona.”
It’s a strategy aimed at quietly taking down President Donald Trump, one “new voter in rapidly diversifying states across the southern U.S.” at a time, as Politico wrote.
It’s a strategy that skirts the enemy’s knowledge, and therefore, oftentimes, the enemy’s win.
And it’s a strategy that takes full advantage of dark money-type donations that are difficult to track and even more difficult to thwart.
It’s one thing for Soros to take his hatred of this president and his disdain for free market America to the public stage — as he just did in Davos, when he criticized Trump as a “con man” whose “narcissism” has turned “into a malignant disease,” as CNBC reported.
It’s another for Soros to slide, on the sly, his anti-American influences deep into America’s politics and culture. And now: education.
In Davos, he announced the infusion of $1 billion into a new Open Society University Network to fund schools around the world — to “educate against nationalism,” is how the Financial Times reported it.
In other words: to train the next generation in the evils of sovereignty — to teach the emerging youth how to become good obedient citizens of the world.
Soros calls it his “most important and enduring project” ever. No wonder. It truly could be. If successful, it could mean the collapse of borders, the implementation of world government, the end of America as we know it.
If children are the hope of the future, America’s children must be educated on the greatness of America — before it becomes too late and America, as a sovereign nation, hasn’t any future at all.
Soros pours billions of dollars into the following anti-USA causes;
  • Promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation
  • Promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
  • Opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act
  • Depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral
  • Promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
  • Promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
  • Promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
  • Defending suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters
  • Financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
  • Advocating America's unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending
  • Opposing the death penalty in all circumstances
  • Promoting socialized medicine in the United States
  • Promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is “not clean air and clean water, [but] rather ... the demolition of technological/industrial civilization”
  • Bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations
  • Promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike

See: GUIDE TO THE GEORGE SOROS NETWORK


Social Justice is all about Socialism. Social Justice is NOT about JUSTICE, it is about Marxist ideology advancing immoral values. Today, critical race theory, feminism, intersectional theory, LGBTQ advocacy, progressive immigration policies, animal rights, and other left-wing political causes. All are actively vying for evangelical acceptance under the rubric of “social justice."

Let me say this, there is no Justice but God's Justice, and this world better get on board with that. We will deal more on this subject in another article.


1960’s radical Bill Ayers, is an American elementary education theorist. During the 1960s, Ayers was a leader of the Weather Underground that opposed US involvement in the Vietnam War. He is known for his 1960s radical activism and his later work in education reform, curriculum and instruction.

In 1969, Ayers co-founded the Weather Underground, a self-described communist revolutionary group that sought to overthrow imperialism. The Weather Underground conducted a campaign of bombing public buildings (including police stations, the United States Capitol, and the Pentagon) during the 1960s and 1970s in response to U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

Ayers is a retired professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, formerly holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar. During the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign, a controversy arose over his contacts with then-candidate Barack Obama. He is married to lawyer and Clinical Law Professor Bernardine Dohrn, who was also a leader in the Weather Underground.


Phyllis Schlafly was a lawyer, conservative political analyst and the author of the the revised and expanded "Supremacists." She wrote:
Many voters didn't think it important when it surfaced during the presidential campaign that Barack Obama's friend, the 1960s radical William Ayers, is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Ayers' preoccupation with inserting his ideas of "social justice" into public school curriculum didn't seem an issue to make tracks in a national election.
Now we find that in the election week, the most respected education journal, Education Week, featured a front-page article on "social-justice teaching." This confirms that accusations about "social-justice teaching" are not inventions of John McCain's partisan consultants, but are matters that vitally concern everyone who cares what the next generation is taught with taxpayers' money.
"Social-justice teaching" is defined in Education Week as "teaching kids to question whoever happens to hold the reins of power at a particular moment. It's about seeing yourself not just as a consumer (of information), but as an actor-critic" in the world around you. This revealing explanation comes from Bill Bigelow, the curriculum editor of a Milwaukee-based organization called Rethinking Schools, which publishes instructional materials relating to issues of race and equity.
Bigelow admits that this is "a subversive act in some respects because it is not always encouraged by the curriculum." Apparently, he intends to provide the encouragement.
In Bigelow's book "Rethinking Columbus," he wrote that he encourages his students to walk in the shoes of groups that have been oppressed or disenfranchised. He assigns students to role-play various oppressed groups in the United States and foreign countries.
"Social-justice" lessons highlight past mistakes in U.S. history rather than our accomplishments and opportunities. Emphasizing problems and injustices rather than achievements is given the highfalutin label "critical pedagogy."
David Horowitz of the California-based David Horowitz Freedom Center says that social-justice teaching is "shorthand for opposition to American traditions of individual justice and free-market economics." He says it teaches students that "American society is an inherently 'oppressive' society that is 'systemically' racist, 'sexist' and 'classist' and thus discriminates institutionally against women, nonwhites, working Americans and the poor."
Sol Stern of the Manhattan Institute describes Ayers as one of the leaders in "bringing radical social-justice teaching into our public school classrooms." Ayers argues in his books and articles that "social-justice teaching" should be injected into various curriculum subjects.
Education Week identifies the "special-interest groups" that promote "social-justice teaching" and provide curricular materials, online resources and "professional development" (i.e., indoctrinating teachers). These groups include an affiliate of the American Educational Research Association, the Cambridge-based Educators for Social Responsibility and the Washington-based Teaching for Change, in addition to Rethinking Schools.
The lobbyists for "social-justice teaching" and "critical pedagogy" sponsor well-attended conferences (no doubt at taxpayers' expense) and publish magazines. Teachers 4 Social Justice attracted 1,000 educators to an October seminar in Berkeley, Calif.
Lesson plans are available from a 30-year-old magazine called "Radical Teacher," which was founded as "a socialist, feminist, and anti-racist journal on the theory and practice of teaching."
Education Week identifies Ayers-style "social-justice teaching" as rooted in the writings of the late Brazilian educator Paulo Freire. His best-known book, "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" (1970), is considered a classic text of radical education theory and is regularly assigned in education schools.
After Freire's theories took hold in teachers colleges, it's no surprise that they made their way into public schools, especially where low-income and minority kids can be taught oppression studies. Schools that specialize in "social-justice teaching" exist in Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia, among other cities.
The Social Justice High School in Chicago, for example, has a 100 percent Hispanic or black student body. The principal admits that the lessons taught there are often "atypical," such as teaching the relative likelihood of whites and minorities being pulled over by police.
This district recently announced plans to open a "gay-friendly" public high school called Pride Campus with 600 students, half homosexual and half heterosexual. Official materials say that the curriculum will "teach the history of all people who have been oppressed and the civil rights movements that have led to social justice and queer studies."
It is clear that "social-justice teaching" does not mean justice as most Americans understand the term. Those who use the term make clear that it means the United States is an unjust and oppressive society and the solution is to "spread the wealth around."
So how does that play out? 

One of the many tools of Social Justice - Marxist Revolution is the idea of “White Privilege”. White Privilege is an anti-American Agenda.

For those who don’t know what it means, the following is a sample of what is being taught by Social Justice Educator, Paul Kivel. He states,

“So what do I mean by Christian hegemony?
He’s talking about Christian leadership or dominance.
Very simply, I define it as the everyday, pervasive, deep seated and institutionalized dominance of Christian values, Christian institutions, leaders, and Christians as a group, primarily for the benefit of the Christian ruling elites.
“That’s how we might define racism or sexism or other systems of oppression.”
He goes on to say, that “White Privilege” promotes Islamaphobia as well.
Seriously? As if all people don’t have a reason to be concerned about radical Islam? Islam is the most oppressive political/religious group in the world today. Their radical ideology is brutally violent towards women, children, Jews and Western civilization…no concern here.

Here is another example of a Social Justice educator:


Professor Adrien Wing, as the Director of the University of Iowa Center for Human Rights. Here she is talking about Supreme Court Justices, Thurgood Marshall and his replacement Clarence Thomas.

Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer and civil rights activist before serving on the Supreme Court. He was a Liberal Democrat, and had a long career before serving on the Supreme Court.  There he favored "loose constructionism", which meant a loose interpretation of the Constitution to expand civil rights, including abortion rights.

Clarence Thomas was an American lawyer, Attorney General in the State of Missouri, Assistant to Senator John Danforth, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education, and ultimately served in the Supreme Court. He was a Conservative, and highly respected by legal scholars for adhering to an interpretation of the U.S. Constitution based on its original text, meaning and understanding, which has included limiting federal powers. His judicial doctrine finds no basis in the Constitution for abortion.

Both are African American. Marshall on the Left, Thomas a Conservative, let’s see what she has to say:
She says, “Where Critical Race Theory helps us is, it says, “okay, it’s not, you can’t just look at the face. Clarence Thomas is on the Supreme Court. Does he really replace Thurgood Marshall? He’s an embarrassment and a disgrace to the memory of Thurgood Marshall and if I met Clarence Thomas, I’d call him that to his face. That’s 'cus I have something called Tenure. And even then they try to fire you, right? “Oh, look you’ve attacked Clarence!” But global White Privilege is - and unfortunately the president is the face of global White Privilege too. Does having a Black president change that? Has it changed that? Unfortunately, it hasn’t. He ends up being the front man for the system.
So instead of just saying we’re happy there’s a Black face in the White House, who is running the White House instead of just serving in the White House?
It’s like, no, the master’s house has now got a Black face, but its still the master’s house. He works for the master of the system of White Privilege.”
Shocking, isn’t it?

Walter Williams is a Black Conservative Columnist who wrote the following:

Kim Radersman, a former high school English teacher, hosted a session titled, “Stories From the Front Lines of Education: Confessions of a White High School English Teacher.” She said, “Being a white person who does anti-racist work is like being an alcoholic. I will never be recovered by my alcoholism, to use the metaphor. I have to everyday wake up and acknowledge that I am so deeply embedded with racist thoughts and notions and actions in my body, that I have to choose every day to do anti-racist work and think in an anti-racist way.”
So white people, every white person according to Ms Radersman, is a racist who will never be cured, or recovered.

Defining Anti-Racist Work: It is involvement in, and the advancing of pro-Marxist revolution.  It's summed up as this:

1. Anti-Racist Work is an Anti-Christian Revolution.

2. Anti-Racist Work is an Anti-White revolution.

3. Anti-Racist Work is also an Anti-Family revolution.
In order to NOT be a racist, you must EMBRACE Marxist ideology, and practice the anti-racist work as mentioned above.

Walter Williams went on to say,

But the propaganda and lunacy go even deeper. Jacqueline Battalora, Proffessor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at Saint Xavier University, informed participants at a White Privilege Conference that “White people did not even exist before 1682.
This coming from a professor teaching at university level is both shocking and incredibly ignorant.
If Professor Battalora is correct, how are we to identify William Shakespeare (1564), Sir Isaac Newton (1642), John Lock (1632), Leonardo da Vinci (1452), Plato (428) B.C., and millions of others???
Were these men people of color, or did they just not exist?
Williams continues,
“Stephanie Baran’s message to conference participants was that "Capitalism is the Cause of Racism in the World Today."
This adjunt professor at Kankakee Community College, who calls herself a Vulgar Marxist, added that racism was “invented” in Colonial America by White Capitalists as a tool to divide labor and keep the working class in their place.
Talk about re-writing history! I can’t imagine people being so ignorant as to believe anything this woman said at the White Privilege Conference, but there must be, they are everywhere parroting the stupid claims.

These people are embedded in Marxism, it’s socialism, social justice,  it’s anti-American, and it's anti-Christian. 

Neo-Marxism has infiltrated every area of life.


Neo-Marxism encompasses 20th-century approaches that amend or extend Marxism and Marxist theory, typically by incorporating elements from other intellectual traditions such as critical theory, psychoanalysis, or existentialism (in the case of Jean-Paul Sartre).

A government system, divorced from it’s roots, cannot go on, no matter what political party is voted in, and will most certainly fall at the hands of Marxist radicals.

Modern man attempts to be autonomous, to be independent from God, from those things He has taught in His Word, and the revelation of God in Christ. This has greatly affected political leaders, university professors, and common people.

I have much more to add to this, but that will be in future articles in this series.
A Word About Black Lives Matter 

Of course Black lives matter, they (we) are created in the image of God. Those who have suffered deserve our support, and they do, as should anyone who has suffered unjustly.

As we look around us we see a lot of injustice and suffering in the world. These things are not limited to one people group, no one has a corner on it, no one will ever will.

So what should we do? Do we join an organization to affirm these things? Do we join out of sympathy, or compassion? Do we join because everyone else is?  Do we join because we are being pressured to?

The questions we need to ask are this:
  1. What does this organization believe?
  2. What is their agenda?
  3. What are they involved in? 
  4. What is their conduct like?
  5. Will my participation in this organization glorify God?
Black Lives Matters is one of many Neo-Marxist organizations dividing Americans, and tearing down every Christian value woven into the very foundation of this nation. 

There are some who argue that BLM is not a Marxist Organization. They are according to their own words. Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said in a newly surfaced video from 2015 that she and her fellow organizers are “trained Marxists” – making clear their movement’s ideological foundation, according to a report.

See Links: New York Post Article 
Trained Marxist Patrisse Cullors - Black Lives Matters BLM (Video) 
Marxism and the Fight for Black Freedom

What do we know about Black Lives Matter, Should Christians Join With them?

BLM has little to do with the color of anyone’s skin! They are an revolutionary organization that are disruptive, radical, rebellious, anti-authority, Marxist, and atheistic. 


Their behavior and their belief system are Satanic! Utilizing the suffering of some people as the means to destroy their lives should be eye-opening.  They are actively and militantly working to destroy morality, the conscience, the family, and the Church.

Those things are being replaced with immorality, perverseness and abominable behavior that kills the soul, the family, marriage and society. 

This is the path of total and absolute destruction.  Do we really have to labor over whether or not this is God's justice?  Whether or not Christians should participate? 

Christian, the Bible is our source of morality.  We are made in God's image, created with a sense of right and wrong, and the freedom to make choices, whether good or evil.  We differentiate between right and wrong by our knowledge of His law, through revelation and conscience. That law is written on our hearts (Romans 2:15). 

Social Consensus is not Biblical Morality and never will be!

We are to keep our consciences clear by obeying God and keeping our relationship with Him in good standing. We do this by the application of His Word, renewing and softening our hearts continually. We consider those whose consciences are weak, treating them with Christian love and compassion.

The Bible contains God’s revealed moral will in His law and commandments.  His revelation to His people. The Bible is our source of morality because the Bible is the very Word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Peter 1:21).

If the Christian wants to know God’s will, he turns to the Bible. If the Christian wants to discern right from wrong, he turns to the Bible.

In the book of Leviticus and again in 1 Peter, God said, "Be holy, for I the Lord am holy."
Does holiness include violent riots? No it does not!


What are BLM's guiding principals? 

According to their own documents, here are a few:
“Black Lives Matter is transgender-affirming. We make space for transgender siblings. We do the work required to dismantle cisgender” – which mean biological sex – “and uplift transgender Black folk, especially transgender Black women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans antagonistic violence.” 
So they are trans-gender affirming.  Well, according to Deuteronomy 22:5, transgender behavior is an abomination to God.  I didn't say it, the Bible does.
“We are womanists rather than feminists.” Quote: “We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments where men are centered.” 
They are transgender-affirming and wanting to pull down the leadership of men. According to the Word of God, man is the head of the woman, as God is the head of Christ. The man has the responsibility of leadership. Again, not biblical.
“We are queer-affirming. We gather to free ourselves from the tight grip of the belief that all are heterosexual.” 
They gather to put an end to the notion that everybody needs to be heterosexual. In he same book of Leviticus, where the Lord says, “I am the Lord; be holy,” chapter 18, verse 22 say, “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination." In the next verse it says it’s the same as having intercourse with an animal. Chapter 20 of Leviticus, verse 13, exactly the same thing. Romans chapter 1.
“We are intentionally amplifying that the particular experience of violence that Black queer transgender, gender nonconforming women and intersex people face, there can be no liberation for the Black people if we do not fight for these people.”
Their documents reveal that their rebellion is against God. They are anti-God, anti-Scripture, and anti-Christ. This organization is the enemy of God. 

They resist God's authority and oppose His law. Do you really believe that going down that path is going to do anything that will actually lift up a culture?

The law of God, the family, the message of the Gospel are God’s restraints on mankind. Wiping those things out the only restraint left is law enforcement, and we all know what they are trying to do with that.

Christian, scripture warns us not to have any fellowship with the unfruitful works for darkness, but rather reprove them. Ephesians 5:11

There is one very simple question to ask yourself before your emotions are stirred up to join a movement, What does God say about it?

Studying and knowing the scriptures will keep you from walking in the counsel of the ungodly, standing or taking in the way of sinners, and sitting with the scorners.

Make your delight in God, in His law, and meditate on His word day and night. Let him refresh you, sustain you, teach you and fill you so that you might be strong and stable in the Lord.

When nations are divided, desolation lies ahead. When homes are divided, they will not stand. What can we do? What is the solution to all of this? The answer is found in each of us humbly recommitting our devotion to God, to His Word and to His ways, in all manner of life, that we might be used God to bring forth His purposes in our lives, in our communities, and in our nation! 

Friends, Christianity and Marxism are very opposing worldviews. God has provided us with the Gospel message of salvation, and Marx provided a way to wipe Christianity from the earth. You cannot embrace an anti-Christ ideology for the sake of peace…it is false, and it will lead to your own demise.

In part two of this series, we will be covering  a biographical sketch of Karl Marx, socialist revolutionary and author of "The Communist Manifesto."  We will also be taking a look into his early writings that appear to be steeped in Satanic worship and the occult.

Related topics:
  
The GRAVE CONDITION of AMERICA’S WORLDVIEW

A Chronological History of the New World Order, by D. L. Cuddy, Ph.D.




No comments:

ReferenceTagging.tag();