"We see, in many a land, the proudest dynasties and tyrannies still crushing, with their mountain weight, every free motion of the Consciences and hearts of men. We see, on the other hand, the truest heroism for the right and the greatest devotion to the Truth in hearts that God has touched. We have a work to do, as great as our forefathers and, perhaps, far greater. The enemies of Truth are more numerous and subtle than ever and the needs of the Church are greater than at any preceding time. If we are not debtors to the present, then men were never debtors to their age and their time. Brethren, we are debtors to the hour in which we live. Oh, that we might stamp it with Truth and that God might help us to impress upon its wings some proof that it has not flown by neglected and unheeded." -- C.H. Spurgeon . . . "If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:31, 32 . . . . . Our Website is UNDER CONSTRUCTION, please be patient!



Bookmark and Share

Monday, January 16, 2012

JESUS IS GOD – The WORD Incarnate a.k.a. the MESSIAH of Israel – Part THREE

By James Fire

In exploring the Deity of Jesus Christ as being co-equal to the Father, the subject of the Trinity inevitably and necessarily comes up. While the word ‘trinity’ never appears in the Scripture, the conceptual and spiritual truth of it are everywhere in Scripture and reinforces the doctrine of Christ’s Deity (and that of the Holy Spirit as well).


Along with the following treatment on the triune nature of the Godhead, here is an excellent teaching on
The Trinity by Koinonia House with Chuck Missler in this video presentation, where Dr. Missler shows how all three Persons of the Trinity were involved in the creation, in the resurrection of Christ, the indwelling of the believer, and how the many appellations of Scripture, describing God are attributed to all three Members of the Godhead.

The TRINITY - 1 Hr. 19 mins.

Should you wish to read, rather than listen to this presentation, you may do so in this summary article here (a concise treatment): The Trinity: One God or Three?.

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:
And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

“ . . .The Bible clearly teaches that there is one God. However, we have seen that the Messiah is called ‘God with us,’ ‘the Mighty God,’ ‘the LORD (YHWH) our Righteousness,’ and that he is served and worshiped by all people and even God’s angels during the [coming] kingdom age. We have also found evidence that the Messiah will be a physical manifestation of God or God in the flesh.”

How can we reconcile the truth of God being one, and yet also three? This is where the truth of the triune nature of God is revealed, and as early as Genesis chapter one (in the Hebrew). As has already been stated, the name of God used throughout Scripture is “El” and in the very first verse of Genesis we have the following:

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

There are two points of interest in this verse: 

Firstly is the word for God: one would expect that the Hebrew word here would also be “El” as found elsewhere, and yet the word used is “Eloheim” instead. In Hebrew, by adding the suffix “im” it changes the word from the singular to the plural form. The word “El” is God; “Eloheim” would therefore mean “Gods”. However no where in Scripture is true Deity revealed as a pantheon, that is, a multiplicity of gods such as the ancient pagan cultures worshiped (the most commonly known is the Greek and Roman pantheon), so what is being revealed here at the very onset of Genesis?

Many who deny the trinity will claim that this Christian doctrine is based on pagan religion, such as the following website: Trinity Truth, and its article:
The Pagan Origins of The Trinity Doctrine. The problem however is that these pagan deities while forming an alliance in a triad, each member of these are distinctly different from each other; some are male, others are female; they all display different powers, characteristics, jurisdictions and nature.

The biblical trinity however, reveals God in three Persons who are precisely and wholly identical in their power, characteristics, jurisdictions, and nature (The video above by Chuck Missler elaborates on this).
Another point could easily be made that Satan would (and did) take the truth of the trinity and mimic this while also perverting it (as he does with all biblical truth) in the representation of various pagan religions.

Secondly, the word for “created” here used in Hebrew is “barah” which is in the singular form; in virtually all languages, and especially Hebrew, the verb must agree with the noun, and yet here the noun is in the plural form, the verb in the singular. Is God accustomed to inspire His writers to use bad grammar? Hardly; rather this is a clue to reveal the very nature of the Godhead!

Another insight into the triune nature of God:

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Mark Eastman remarks:

“According to this fascinating verse, man was created by God (Eloheim) in his own image. However, there is something provocative and unexpected in this verse. Prior to the creation of man we find a conversation between God (Eloheim) and an unidentified being (“let US make man in OUR image”). Who is this person with whom God is speaking?

“… Firstly, the being is able to speak with God ‘on his own turf’ that is, in the realm of timeless eternity. We know this because man had not yet been created. Therefore, God was not talking to an earthly intelligence. He must have been speaking to a being that exists in the supernatural, eternal realm.

“Secondly, this being apparently has the same kind of creative ability as God. This describes a cooperative effort between Eloheim and the person with whom he is speaking. Finally, the likeness or image of this being is comparable to God’s.”

The assertion to disprove these allusions of a triune Deity is that God was speaking to the angels (who were presumably created prior to the physical universe (JOB 34: 4-7)), but angels cannot create (barah) as does God, nor are they in the image of God, nor is man created in angelic likeness – therefore this argument is invalid.

So who is this mysterious person that is on par with God Himself?
No one other but God Himself, represented in another Person.
Revisiting the verse from Deuteronomy, Dr. Eastman rightly points something out that must be understood regarding the Oneness of God - 

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

The Hebrew word used for “one” here is not the numerical ‘one’ (that would be “yachiyd” or “one and only one;” in English this word is often translated as “only;” take for example the passage in 
GEN 22:2 in reference to Abraham’s son Isaac, his “only (yachiyd) son;” See also ZECH 12;10), but rather a ‘united one’ (“echad”) or one might say a unit.

When a football game is engaged, there are two teams out in the field; yet there are a number of players, half of each belonging to one of those teams. One team or unit, many players: the players are distinct from one another, they have their own names, their own number, their own record, but still belong to a whole (unit).

The same can be seen in GEN 2:24 where the man and wife are seen as one (echad) flesh, but comprising of two distinct bodies. The marriage is a unit of two, man and wife.

Likewise in GEN 11:6, the LORD God observes that the people at Babel “are one (echad) people…” An entire population of distinct, self-contained individuals, and yet collectively seen as “one (echad)”.

The Holy Spirit could well have inspired Moses to use the Hebrew word yachiyd rather than echad if He meant to emphasize that God indeed is a singular, distinct Person with no equal, the only One of Israel; yet such was not the case – the word indeed is echad, expressing a unity, a compound one.

This is further demonstrated in Ecclesiastes, as well as Isaiah –

Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not, nor the years draw nigh, when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them;

For thy Maker is thine husband; the LORD of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called.

In both cases the plural form of “Creator” and “Maker” is used (Young’s Literal Translation, 1898 ed.)! Note particularly in the passage from Isaiah that the prophet uses three different appellations for God – the LORD of hosts, thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel and The God of the whole earth, perhaps a further demonstration of the tri-unity of God.


Dr. Eastman concludes the following in regards to all the above findings:

“How can all this be true and yet there be only one true God? The only possible answer is that God is a plural being manifested in at least two Persons, one of which must be the Messiah!

“In the entire history of the world there is only one person who has even made claims compatible with the criteria we have examined. His name was [and is] Jesus of Nazareth. During the life of Jesus of Nazareth, he claimed equality with God. In fact, he was tried and condemned by the Sanhedrin for this very claim. Yet, the claims of Jesus were totally compatible with the scriptural paradoxes we have just examined.

JOHN 10:30-33
I and my Father are one.
Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?
The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

Five controversial words in vs. 30 that are just as potent as the three (“JESUS is GOD”) that my brother in Christ has on his van and lap top, and yet even here in this verse from the Gospel of John we understand that the word used for “one” here in the Greek is also defined as “a compound unit of one”.

The Jews understood what Jesus was claiming, because they said as much as the very reason why they wanted to stone Him: “…because that you, being a man make yourself God.” They knew He was claiming Deity!

Yet Jehovah Witnesses and other cults are quick to point out that Jesus here was supposedly correcting them by saying that He was only the “SON of God” (vs. 36), but NOT God Himself.
Yet Scripture also points out concerning Jesus, the Son of God that He is …

JOHN 1:14, 18
. . . the Word . . . made flesh, and [that He] dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Note that term: “the only begotten Son of the Father” in reference to the Word made flesh, that is Jesus Christ, of whom it was said that the “Word was God” (vs. 1).

I would like the reader to consider something with me:
When a man and woman come together and have a child, that child is a human being just as their parents are: an infant, not a mature being to be sure, but nevertheless a human.

When an ostrich has offspring, they are also ostriches; the same goes for fish, the birds and the bees. Each of the offspring will grow and possess the same qualities, given time, as their parents once they are fully developed and mature.

Jesus, being the Son of GOD, being the ONLY BEGOTTEN of the Father would not be anything different than the Father (God), any more than any human begotten infant would be different from their parents (that is, human). There is a distinct difference however that must be acknowledged in the use of this analogy:

Any creature in the world is subject to time, thus there is a time of their birth, time requirements for development and maturity, a time in which the offspring will excel the abilities of their aging parents, a time in which the offspring themselves will procreate offspring of their own, and eventually become aged themselves and a time in which they die.

Jesus Christ however, being the only begotten of the Father would share in the same qualities as the Father. As the Father is God, so is the Son; as the Father is timeless and self-existing in eternity, so is the Son (thus the Son in His Divinity is without beginning and, or end [rather, He is called the Alpha and the Omega], and so is outside of the limitations and influences of time) – He Himself has no beginning or ending as would one who is created, because He would share in the trait of eternal existence with the Father; He would not be immature or underdeveloped nor have a need to mature and grow as He is already Perfect and Immutable, just like His Father.

The fact that Scripture specifically states that He is one (echad – a unified whole) with the Father demonstrates that He is an equal member of and in no way inferior to, the other members of the Godhead.

Certainly He allowed Himself a submissive role to the Father for the purpose of being what Scripture portrays Him as “the Servant of the LORD (ISAIAH 42: 1-7)” and that He might learn (experientially) obedience through suffering (HEB 5: 7-9), but these are those things He endured in His humanity and by no means detracts from His Divinity.

The LORD Jesus also stated in this Gospel:

JOHN 8:24, 56-58
I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am [he], ye shall die in your sins.
Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

Note in vs. 24 the word “he” is in brackets; in the original Greek this word does not appear, so what Jesus was saying is “if you believe not that I AM, you shall dies in your sins.”

Likewise in vs. 58, He again says “I Am” in a rather peculiar fashion. If Jesus is indeed a pre-existent Person, one might expect Him to say, “I was before Abraham” or even “before Abraham, I was” but instead He says “I AM” in a perfect present-tense, declaring that He existed for all time and beyond. These of course are the famous words issued from the burning bush that Moses encountered. The Law giver and prophet asked God:

EXODUS 3:13-14
. . . Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

“I AM” . . . there is no doubt as to the claim of Jesus, that He in fact stated that He is God; and at that point of declaration the Jewish leaders performed their customary underscoring of His statement by attempting to stone Him (for blasphemy).

Thomas declared Jesus as his Lord and his God in JOHN 20:28; Philip was told by the LORD Jesus Himself that because he has seen Him (Jesus) he has seen the Father in JOHN 14:9; just prior to this Jesus declared that He Himself is the Way, the Truth and the Life – not that He was showing the way, or revealing the truth, or exhibiting a manner of life to be modeled, but that He Himself integrally is all of these (a claim no other religious leader has ever made; Jesus of Nazareth is exclusive in this claim, and has verified it by His teachings, His power, His fulfilling of Messianic prophecies* and His resurrection from the dead.

*For an excellent resource in the study of the myriad of multitudinous prophecies regarding the Messiah, please read
All the Messianic Prophecies of the Bible by Herbert Lockyer, some incredibly power packed chapters steeped in Scriptural evidences, proving that Jesus fulfilled the Messianic prophecies and is indeed the Messiah of Israel!

(A book review of Herbert Lockyer’s work on this subject would be a worthy series of articles on TTUF in their own right! LORD permitting, we shall endeavor to do so.)

It’s also noteworthy that the LORD Jesus accepted worship from others which is strictly forbidden by the aforementioned verse in 
DEUT 8:19. He declared in His prayer to the Father (JOHN 17:5) that He existed in heaven, in eternity, prior to the creation of the world.

JOHN 1:1-3,14 when compared with GEN 1:1,26 reveals the reasonable conclusion that “in the beginning” Jesus, the Word made flesh, was with the Father and that they were co-Creators.

Dr. Norman Geisler has written much about the Deity of Christ in The BAKER Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics and we now turn to the segment pertinent to our article:

“Central to Christianity is the belief that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, that is, God manifest in human flesh. The evidence for this is as follows:

1. Truth about reality is knowable.
2. Opposites cannot both be true.
3. God exists.
4. Miracles are possible.
5. A miracle is an act of God to confirm the truth of God claimed by a messenger of God.
6. The New Testament documents are reliable.
7. In the New Testament Jesus claimed to be God.
8. Jesus proved to be God by an unprecedented convergence of miracles.
9. Therefore, Jesus [is] God in human flesh.”

Dr. Geisler’s work dealt previously with the first six points above, so he focuses at this point on 7 through 8, and so shall we . . . in the next article in this series! 

Until then, the LORD bless and keep you in His grace and peace!
Read more!

Sunday, January 15, 2012

A Study in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans – “On the Road of Righteousness” Chapter Eight: Part One

Chapter Eight: Not Living in the ‘Condo’s’ Anymore!

~ By James Fire

Note: Due to the fact that this chapter has almost 40 verses, this study will be presented in two, or three parts.

As mentioned before in our last study, conducted several weeks ago, it was stated: “The book of Romans is sometimes compared to a cathedral with its many chambers and rooms of deep theological and doctrinal truths; in this analogy, Chapter Eight is seen the highest spires and towers of that cathedral as the heights of its glories are unmatched anywhere else in the epistle, or much of the New Testament for that matter!”

So let us begin our study!

Read more!

Sunday, January 8, 2012


~~ by A.M. Kisly

Things are rapidly changing in the United States. Who would have ever thought that we would see a Socialist/Marxist/ Globalist Government take over America? There has always been corruption in high places, yet what we are watching take place almost daily, a system that ignores the will of the people or the protections afforded them in our Constitution, well we can only imagine the implications this will have in the long run. What does it all mean? What does it mean for the believer? In the face of adversity, staying the course can become quite difficult as it seeks to prevent us from fulfilling God’s purpose in our lives. Yet God has equipped us with all that we need to fulfill what he has commanded us to do. Regardless of the news, let's STAY THE COURSE!

We’ve been listening to the warnings of many concerned citizens over the past few years of the coming take-over of America, martial law, the dismantling of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. With globalists now in power in every nation around the world, including our own, we have all agonized in the painful process of watching our nation slip away.

This nation was founded by Christian men and women who faced great challenges, hardships, and tyranny. They built this country through blood, sweat and prayer. Their lives were committed to the One true God of the Bible, to their families and the spreading of the Gospel.

How far we have fallen away from God and have built ourselves graven images in order to exalt man’s ways above God, our Creator. Here we are a few centuries after those first settlers offered thanksgiving and praise to the Lord for His guidance, protection, provision and freedom to worship in this new land, only to see it all being erased, blotted out, and counted for nothing. This past year we have watched as the ungodly leaders of this nation pass and enforce new laws protecting the abhorrent behavior of man. We watch as the President of this country insist and impose new tax laws that steal from one man and give to another. We watch as government handouts bankrupt our country. We watch as the world embraces every form of evil, and mock that which is good. We watch as evil as become good and good become evil.

Here we are still in the first days of the New Year worrying about another attack on the freedoms and rights afforded to every citizen of this country. President Obama must think of himself wiser than those who wrote the Bill of Rights for the protection of our citizens. President Obama along with the overwhelming support of our Congress just signed into law H.R. 1540 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

The National Defense Authorization Act is a United States federal law that has been enacted for each of the past 48 years to specify the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense.

However, as always, they snuck in a bill called H.R. 1540, which is not your typical defense spending bill. What has everyone up in arms is the fact that this bill gives authority to the president to order the military to detain U.S. citizens (indefinitely) who are under suspicion of being a terrorist or linked to a terrorist organization…without due process. This means that whether there is a justified “suspicion” or not, the military can now take you away to one of those secret prison camps; hold you without charge, trial and jury…indefinitely.

Of course, Obama did promise the following: "My Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens." Words of advice; don’t trust a politician….especially one that opposes God in every aspect of life.

Others are saying that Due process is a constitutional right that can't be limited by statute! The constitution takes priority over any statute, and if a statute disagrees with the constitution, the statute loses. If you remember that, you'll see why the NDAA can't, by definition, take away any due process rights you already have. For due process (or any constitutional right) to be taken away there needs to be a constitutional amendment.

Claiming that unconstitutional legislation is no concern, because the Constitution overrides it is really naïve. So we should all just sit back and applaud as each unconstitutional bill is passed, as apparently (according to some naïve thinkers) active laws and their effective interpretations never violate the Constitution.

I don’t know about you, I am not reassured at all. Obama may or may not remain president of this country in the following election and we certainly know that our government as of late likes to do unconstitutional things and put up barriers to challenging the action in court at all.

In an article written by Amanda Fox-Rouch,

“Legal scholar Jonathan Turley purports that despite what Obama says in his statement, the revisions made to the bill were merely rhetorical in nature, and that it ultimately provides the military with “extraordinary powers” to detain American citizens without providing them with a fair trial. Despite what Obama has said on the topic, Turley says that the powers imparted to the military and the Obama administration by way of this bill are cause for concern.

This is amplified by the fact that American citizens who are being investigated for being suspected of terrorism cannot inform others about the investigation without facing prosecution as per provisions of the PATRIOT Act. Coupled with the NDAA, a citizen wrongly suspected of terrorist activities could now theoretically be held in military detention for months without trial, and be released only to be restricted from taking legal action against his captors.

The implications of this legislation reflect the idea that certain liberties and freedoms must be sacrificed in the name of protecting the country from further terrorist attacks — a notion that is widely disputed by various groups concerned with civil liberties.”

Adding this newly passed legislation to the already controversial Patriot Act, and something else I just stumbled over, a new bill in pending called H.R. 3166: Enemy Expatriation Act, one begins to wonder what the real objectives are. I haven’t researched this out, but according to the government website, this would add “engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality.” The bill is written by Rep. Charles Dent and the status of the bill is in the first step of the legislative process.

Of course on the surface, all of this legislation sounds fine, if we all agree that the enemies in which we are discussing are outside forces seeking to destroy us; however that is not the case.

Here’s the real problem…..with Obama continually suggesting that old school thought (Constitution and Bill of Rights as it was written) no longer applies….it went out with the Colonial period. There is every reason to be concerned about his specific ideals and agenda.

Aside from the Constitutionality problems with this legislation, let’s consider another outrageous fact.

For instance, let’s consider the problem with the ever evolving definition of what a terrorist is. When we consider that the definition of the words “terrorist, terrorism, terrorist groups” seems to mean anyone in philosophical opposition to the Left’s or Globalist’s scope of “political correctness”. It. should cause every citizen to question with great vigor what is really going on in the grand scheme of things. We all remember the controversial report put out by the Department of Homeland Security. Let me refresh your memory…. Rightwing Conservatives have been listed to be on their suspicious “terrorist” report.

The federal Homeland Security Department document entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Environment Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” contains the following definition:

“Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

Also targeted in the report are veterans, folks anticipating additional restrictions to their Second Amendment rights, and those concerned about the loss of U.S. sovereignty.

**This report implies that one harboring these sorts of views is a racist as well as a potential terrorism suspect.

PDF file here: HSA Rightwing Extremism

I ought to mention that Obama did offer a promise of the following: "My Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens."

I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t offer any real comfort or reassurance at all. Obama may or may not remain president of this country in the following election. Regardless of whoever takes his place, this law is dangerous in the hands of those pushing the radicalization of America.

Many in government will argue that there is nothing for Americans to worry about -- unless you're a terrorist that is. But as our government slips further and further from the rule of law and the founding principles of our nation that once made us great, tyranny inevitably creeps in to take its place. And when tyranny reigns, the line between who is a terrorist and who isn't becomes easily blurred. A "terrorist" could simply mean a political enemy of the state.

Out of all the main contenders for the presidency, there is only one who has voiced opposition for the egregious bill. It should be predictable at this point that the one who stood on the side of the Constitution was Rep. Ron Paul. He said of the bill,

“Little by little, in the name of fighting terrorism, our Bill of Rights is being repealed...The Patriot Act, as bad as its violation of the 4th Amendment, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed (NDAA) continues that slip toward tyranny and in fact accelerates it significantly. Those studying this bill say that the main section of concern, Section 1021 of the NDAA Conference Report, does to the 5th Amendment what the PATRIOT Act does to the 4th. The 5th Amendment is about much more than the right to remain silent in the face of government questioning. It contains very basic and very critical stipulations about due process of law. The government cannot imprison a person for no reason and with no evidence presented or access to legal counsel.”

He explains that the dangers of the new law are in its deliberate vagueness:

“The dangers in the NDAA are its alarmingly vague, undefined criteria for who can be indefinitely detained by the US government without trial. It is now no longer limited to members of al Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone accused of “substantially supporting” such groups or “associated forces.” How closely associated? And what constitutes "substantial" support? What if it was discovered that someone who committed a terrorist act was once involved with a charity? Or supported a political candidate? Are all donors of that charity or supporters of that candidate now suspect, and subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now an associated force?”

Here’s the crux of the matter, the Bill of Rights is a check on government power against any person. This is the very strength of our legal system. The NDAA attempts to justify abridging the bill of rights on the theory that rights are suspended in a time of war….problem is only the entire United States is a battlefield in the War on Terror!

To say that this is a very dangerous development is an understatement….at the risk of being regarded as a conspiracist loon; I say that this development reeks of the globalist agenda.

What does it mean for us? Well to be honest, I just don’t know. Things are changing rapidly in the United States. Who would have ever thought that we would see a Socialist/Marxist/ Globalist Government take over America? There has always been corruption in high places, yet what we are watching take place almost daily, a system that ignores the will of the people or the protections afforded them in our Constitution, well we can only imagine the implications this will have in the long run.

What does it mean for us as Christians? Absolutely nothing!

Let’s refocus on the biblical aspect of these difficult times we live in.

Since the onset of our website, we have always pointed us back to the Bible, a sure word of testimony of God to mankind. His word through biblical prophecy has determined the beginning and the end, and our focus is and will remain on what He said, not on what man will do.

It is easy to get knocked off course in our spiritual life. As believers in Jesus Christ, our walk and our future is not based on what the globalists are doing, nor is it based on the decisions of unrighteous leadership in Washington. Our lives and our future rest solely in the hands of God according to what He hath said. Our future and our hope rest upon Jesus the resurrected Christ who is coming back again as King of kings and Lord of Lords!

Jeremiah 29:11 states,
“For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end.”

As followers of Christ, we are not to be alarmed by the things happening in this world knowing that we can meet any challenge with solid assurance and an unwavering faith.

Paul shared that there would be distresses, struggles, afflictions and even perplexity in faithful Christian service. However, what came through very distinctly at the same time is that even in the midst of all these difficulties, the believers need not lose heart but they can be of good courage.

2 Corinthians 4:1
“Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not;”

2 Corinthians 4:16
“For which cause we faint not; but though our outward man perish, yet the inward man is renewed day by day.”
Sufferings, pain and difficulties can cause us to be bitter, discouraged and angry against God. They can lead us to wallow in self-pity and to sink into passivity, indifference, apathy and
unbelief. This is exactly what Satan desires for God’s people.

However, we must learn to get our minds off of the circumstances surrounding us and back on the Lord and in His Word. In doing so we have peace that passes all understanding and we can be of good courage because of the ‘hope’ and ‘glory’ we have in Christ Jesus our Lord.

We need not lose heart in the last days; instead we can take heart and be courageous and confident in God. Why? Because…


O what joy and strength we find in that awesome revelation of God to man. O that we can know and fully appreciate that the only true God, the triune God is indeed our God, and we are His children. The great “I am”, the Almighty, Unchanging Everlasting Triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, is our God because we have been accepted in the beloved through Jesus Christ our Savior and Lord.

I have seen so many Christians running around sounding the alarm without offering hope or encouragement. Are we to be worrying, dreading the future and compromising with the world in order to fix all the problems of the world? Having begun in the Spirit do we now turn to the flesh? From the beginning it was sin that brought us death and destruction and so it remains the same today.

As Christians we have been given a mandate. God has equipped us with all that we need to fulfill what he has commanded us to do. Are we missing the mark? Are we carrying out the mandate to make disciples of all nations? Are we indeed fulfilling the Great Commission? Are we staying the course?

May the Lord God help us to evaluate our hearts honestly as we see the day approaching and realize that we need to stand before Him and give an account of our lives and our ministry.
Read more!