"We see, in many a land, the proudest dynasties and tyrannies still crushing, with their mountain weight, every free motion of the Consciences and hearts of men. We see, on the other hand, the truest heroism for the right and the greatest devotion to the Truth in hearts that God has touched. We have a work to do, as great as our forefathers and, perhaps, far greater. The enemies of Truth are more numerous and subtle than ever and the needs of the Church are greater than at any preceding time. If we are not debtors to the present, then men were never debtors to their age and their time. Brethren, we are debtors to the hour in which we live. Oh, that we might stamp it with Truth and that God might help us to impress upon its wings some proof that it has not flown by neglected and unheeded." -- C.H. Spurgeon . . . "If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:31, 32

HTML

BOOKMARK AND SHARE

Bookmark and Share

Monday, October 17, 2011

A Study in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans – “On the Road of Righteousness” Chapter Four:

~ ~ By James Fire

Chapter Four: Justifying the Ungodly and Imputing Righteousness by Faith

I’ve been most eager to begin this particular chapter, because, as you know (if you read the previous study) this is the portion of scripture (vs. 1-5) that the LORD used to lead me to salvation back in June of 1980. Obviously then, this passage is very dear to my heart.

If you have not yet had the opportunity to read my testimony, here is a link provided for you FROM the MIND of FIRE: CAN I GET A WITNESS?
Suffice it to say, in my ‘B.C.’ days, I was very much intent on learning what my purpose in life was, and at the same time ‘plagued’ with the question: How a person such as I, could ever, possibly be considered righteous before the Holy and Awesome God?

As with most of us, I tried to behave myself, be a good person, do the good things, avoid the bad, and hope I could rack up enough points to gain me heaven and approval with God. But as Newsboys so eloquently put it in their song, SHINE:






“Sell the Volvo, shred the Visa
Send the cash to Ma Theresa,
Great idea, the only catch is,
You don’t get saved on merit badges!”




So during my quest for spiritual reality, when I happened upon the fourth chapter of Romans for the first time, these words nearly leaped off the page and assaulted my eye balls:

Rom 4:1-2
What shall we say then
* that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?

For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God
.

* The first of six occurrences of the question, “What shall we say then?” (6:1; 7:7; 8:31; 9:14, 30). This is a rabbinical device, asking a question to solicit an answer from the audience.

Even as a Roman Catholic, I understood that Abraham was one of the ‘heavy hitters’ of the Bible, one of the greatest saints and among the strongest in faith. If anyone would make it and be considered by God as justified by his works, it would be Abraham! He was the model, the epitome, the grand example of a righteous man! The question in my mind was, could I follow suit and be saved by the good works I was attempting to do at that time in my life?

Illustrations of Justification by Faith –

But this passage seemed to say that he might have had reason to boast (“glory”) before people, but not before God! I couldn’t believe what I was reading! Not even ABRAHAM could be justified before God by his works? Then what hope did I have??

Rom 4:3
For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness
.

I always felt as a religious person, that if one simply believed that God existed, that this would lend credible weight towards justification. It wasn’t until much later that I was confronted with the truth that Satan and all his evil hosts believe; they KNOW that God exists and tremble, but obviously they aren’t going to heaven! Neither will any human being be granted heaven based on a “belief” in God’s existence.

James 2:19
Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble
.

I always have to chuckle when I read this verse by James the LORD’s brother; I can almost hear the sarcasm of his words recorded here – “oh, you believe in one God do you? WHOOPIE! Do you also tremble like the demons do?!”

Verse 3 of Chapter Four here in Romans states that “Abraham believed God” not, “believed IN God” which was obvious; of course he did. However, believing someone means that you trust them, account their words as valid and true, express faith in their personal integrity and their actions. We believe our families, our friends; our close associates because we know them, love them and have a relationship with them and are confident in their integrity and trustworthiness.

This was so with Abraham and God; the father of the Hebrew nation is called “the Friend of GOD” in Scripture (2 Chron. 20:7; James 2:23)!

Incidentally, something interesting about those whom God refers to as His friends, or His “beloved” – He seems to share secrets with those He loves. It was so with Abraham His friend, “Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do?” Gen. 18:27.

It was so with Daniel the prophet who was called “greatly beloved” by the herald of God, Gabriel in Dan. 10:11 (I’ve been told by Hebrew scholars that “greatly beloved” can mean “darling” or in an even more colloquial expression, “a cutie”! Someone tell me that this isn’t hilarious!); and just look at the abundance of revelation that was given to Daniel and such secrets revealed to him by the LORD!

In the New Testament we see the same thing with John “the beloved” and the incredible revelation given to him in the book with that very name (although technically, the revelation was given by the Father to the Son; Rev. 1:1), but Who in turn, then revealed it to the Beloved apostle.

The LORD Jesus Himself even stated to His disciples:

John 15:15
Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you
.

I find it an enormously humbling thing therefore (and even thirty one years later, when I think on this, it moves me to grateful tears) that on that Friday morning of June 20th, 1980 that the LORD God, Creator of Heaven and Earth, His glorious Majesty and Eternal KING of Heaven would have stooped so low to make Himself known to me, visiting such a sinner as myself in that humble abode in Syracuse, New York and by granting to me the revelation of the truth of His salvation, voluntarily called me to be His friend as well as His adopted son – a child of the KING! Amazing grace!

So, getting back to Chapter Four . . . we see that God justified Abraham because he “believed God” but what was it that he was believing God for? As we turn to the book of Genesis and the 15th chapter, we read that the LORD spoke to His friend (here called Abram or “father of many”) and said:

Gen 15:1
After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward
.

In verse two we read that ‘Abram’ was childless (doesn’t exactly fit with his name, does it?) and was mourning the fact that he had no inheritor, but the LORD emphatically stated that Abram would have a legitimate heir who in turn would be used to raise up an entire nation as Abram’s descendants (vs. 4 – 5), as numerous as the stars in the heavens! Now, get the picture here: Abram is childless and no ‘spring chicken’ at this time, neither was his wife Sarai (they were both in their late nineties)!

Yet despite all appearances, conditions and situations, Abram “believed God” and because of this, his faith was counted for righteousness (Gen. 15 is a benchmark chapter in the Scriptures for many reasons and we will visit it again in our study in the book of Romans).

So what we see here is that apart from works, having faith in and believing God is something that accounts for us, righteousness or ‘right standing’ with God (Rom. 3: 28) just as it did for Abram.

Note these words that the apostle here uses here in Chapter Four: “counted” (used twice in vs. 3 and 5) and “reckoned” (used three times in vs. 4, 9 and 10) as well as another word, “imputed” (used six times in vs. 6, 8, 11, 22, 23 and 24), and in every case it is the same word in the Greek, logizomai, for a total of eleven times in this chapter alone. Paul uses this word in all of his writings a total of thirty five times (out of a total of forty one times in the entire New Testament)! We will get into the meaning of this in just a moment.

In the mean time, Paul continues:

Rom 4:4
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt
.

I remember as I read this for the first time, it made perfect sense; if you work, you have wages coming to you. Your employer is indebted to you for the work you’ve done for him, and wages cannot be considered a gift at all. OK, then I read the next verse:

Rom 4:5
But to him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness
.

And this is where I slammed on my mental brakes which brought me to a screeching, blue smoking halt! How in the world could God, Who is Holy, justify the ungodly? I could understand perfectly His justifying the godly, but the ungodly? As well as this, that the faith of the ungodly would be counted for righteousness – The FAITH of the ungodly?

I puzzled over this verse, reading it over and over again there in my bedroom thirty one years ago until the LORD God by His Spirit touched my mind with understanding, and then I realized that just as Abram exercised faith in God’s promise, we too can exercise faith in the promise of God regarding the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

All of the scriptural pieces of this puzzle started to coalesce and come together to form this glorious picture of the grace of God through our LORD Jesus, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

Note here, the phrase is used: “believes on” which intimates “reliance upon, a trust in, dependence on, to place one’s faith in” (not merely a belief of something that is true) the One that justifies the ungodly. These are the essential elements of faith (pistis in the Greek).

Now the classic puzzle that many have pondered: the apparent contradiction between what Paul here declares and what James stated in his epistle!

Rom 3:26-28
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law
.

These verses in conjunction with Romans 4:5 (cited above) in comparison with what James said here, would seem to be a contradiction:

James 2:14, 17
What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone
.

. . . it does sound like a contradiction, doesn’t it?

Paul is addressing that aspect of salvation that is referred to as “justification” which is entirely by faith alone, apart from works, just as he made clear in chapters 3 and 4 of Romans; while James is speaking about salvation in respect of “sanctification” that expresses itself by good works manifested in the life of a genuinely saved believer. “A good tree will bear good fruit.”

Paul stresses that there is nothing we can do to add to the salvation of our souls which Christ already atoned for by the propitiation of His holy blood. Salvation and the justification and righteousness that it grants (or “imputes, counts, reckons”) to the sinner saved by grace, is a matter of the heart but it cannot be observed outwardly.

James is saying, “Anyone can say with their lips that they have faith and are saved; what evidence is there that such a claim is true?” It’s as though, to quote the old expression, James “was from Missouri: ‘You gotta show me!’” (See James 2: 14 – 26 to get his point in context).

The point is, to make this alleged contradiction disappear, we are saved apart from works by the grace of God in the atonement of Christ Jesus’ finished work on the Cross, and once genuinely saved we can expect to produce good works/fruit. We are not saved by good works, but good works will prove that we are saved.

Here is a list of verses in the book of Romans that explain the uses of faith, what it is and how it works. I would encourage you to travel the length and breadth of this vital doctrine of faith as expressed here (Note: If you look up the word “faith” in the Old Testament, you might just be startled to discover that there are only two references there! There are only two in the entirety of the Old Testament?? Yes, but what you have to realize is that in the Hebrew the word for “faith” is almost always translated in the Old Testament as “trust” which is found with an overabundance there!):

Romans 3:22, 25, 27-28, 30-31; also, 4: 5, 9, 11-14, 16, 19-20; and 5:1-2; and 9:30, 32; as well as 10: 6, 8, 17; and 11: 20; 12: 3, 6.

Now let’s examine this issue of “reckoning, counting, and imputing”.

In all verses where these three words are found, it’s the same Greek word that is employed, which is logizomai, meaning:

“To take an inventory, i.e., estimate, think, impute, reckon, count or account, suppose, reason, number, conclude, esteem. It is to reckon – whether by calculation or imputation, e.g., Gal 3:6. To “deliberate and so to account” as in Rom 8:36; “account” as in 1 Cor. 4:1; Heb. 11:19; “to consider” as in John 11:50; “suppose” in 1 Peter 5:12. It is used of love in 1 Cor. 13: 5 as not “thinking” of evil. In 2 Cor. 3:5 it’s used in repudiation of the idea that he and fellow servants of God are so self-sufficient as to “think anything” as from themselves, i.e., as to attribute anything to themselves. In 2 Tim. 4:16 it is used of “laying to”, charging a person’s account as a charge against him.

Imputation has three steps: 1) the collecting of all charges and remissions (2) the totaling of these debits and credits (3) the placing of the balance or credit on one’s account.

It would seem that as a result of believing God, the LORD took inventory and made an estimation of Abram’s faith, and finding it genuine, He imputed to him that which he could not acquire on his own (for no work could earn it): a right standing before God (“righteousness” as in vs. 5) by means of justification by grace.

Rom 3:24
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:


Titus 3:4-7
But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,

Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;

That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life
.

Just as Abram was saved by believing in God’s promise that He would bring to His friend, a son, we also are saved because we likewise have believed God, Who brought forth His Son, the Redeemer of all those that trust in Him.

Remember from our study earlier that the three primary parts of salvation are justification, sanctification and glorification and that justification by faith in the grace of God brings to us the blessing (Rom. 4:7-8), honor (Psalm 21:5), and privilege (“power” as in John 1:12) of being delivered from the penalty of sin, that is eternal damnation and affords us passage, bringing us into God’s glorious kingdom.

As it’s been said many times by many pastors and Bible scholars: the Christian who is once justified by faith stands entirely righteous before the LORD from the first moment of conversion and remains equitably so with no decreasing or increasing well into eternity within the domain of heaven.

In regards to our justification, “It is finished” and we cannot add to it whatsoever; to even attempt to do so would be blasphemy for that would presume any work we could do, would embellish or improve upon or even merely add to the glorious, omnipotent, atoning work of the Cross of Christ: an obvious error!

It would be like someone handing you the keys to a fifty room mansion as a gift, fully furnished and exotic in its accommodations, resting on a 120 acre lot, and then you say, “Let me pay you for this” and hand them a five dollar bill!

No, actually it would be far, far worse an insult to a Holy God who sacrificed His Beloved Son for our sins, and then we in our audacity would think to add to this priceless salvation by offering Him our own deplorably weak and paltry efforts of self-righteousness!

Now Paul has illustrated by the faith of Abraham, how everyone can be justified with God, and what he does next is bring David into the picture:

Rom 4:6-8
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.

Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin
.

Chronologically speaking, Abraham came to faith a few centuries before the Law was given by Moses; David however came to faith while under the Mosaic Law – was he then saved by a different method or approach than was Abraham?

Not at all; the above quotes that Paul here makes is from Psalm 32, a ‘Pauline Psalm’ as Martin Luther called it, as it perfectly demonstrates the very same truths as Paul the apostle is expounding on here in Romans, justification by faith alone! You will see in this Psalm the same linearity that Paul outlines: faith in God (vs. 5, 7, and 10), justification resulting from salvation (vs. 1 – 2), an outward working of that justification in the way of righteousness (vs. 8, 11).

Also note the word “imputeth” in vs. 2; in the Greek language version of the Tanakh (O.T. scriptures) called the Septuagint, the word used is once again, logizomai; this word is also used in Psalm 51: 1, 9 “blot out” and Isaiah 43: 24-26 “blotteth out”. In these passages justification is seen and in addition, righteousness in Psalm 51 is evident as a result of this imputation or “blot[teth] out” (Ps. 51: 2, 7, 10; Isaiah 43: 25) for justification; Ps. 51: 13, 19 for righteousness).

Paul then returns to Abraham and considers the question:

Rom 4:9-10
Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.

How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision
.

As we have seen previously in Chapter Two and Three, the Jew would make their boast regarding their lineage to Abraham as the progenitor of the Jewish race, and thereby by this association believe themselves to be inherently justified, because they practiced circumcision just as Abraham did.

Yet Paul turns this argument upside down by pointing out some things that the Jews didn’t consider; Chuck Missler comments from his own study in Romans –

“Abraham was justified before [his] circumcision as a Gentile! Abraham’s age when he was declared righteous (Gen 15:6) is not stated. But later when Hagar bore him Ishmael, he was 86 (Gen 16:16). After that, God instructed Abraham to perform the rite of circumcision on all his male descendants as a sign of God’s covenant with him; this was done when Abraham was 99 (Gen 17:24). Therefore the circumcision of Abraham followed his justification by faith by more than 13 years.”

Rom 4:11-12
And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:

And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised
.

This sign of circumcision was a seal (spraghis in the Greek): “an emblem of ownership and security, combined with the idea of destination, secured from destruction and marked for reward; in the case of circumcision, it is an authentication of the righteousness of Abraham’s faith and an external attestation of the covenant made with him by God”.

Paul understood that this seal was applied only after Abraham demonstrated faith – so technically he wasn’t Jewish when God declared him righteous. Thus Abraham becomes not only the physical father of the Jewish people but also the spiritual father of all Jews that express the same kind of faith as he.

(Note: the revelation given by God to Israel through the Law and the Prophets did not replace faith, but underscored the holiness of God, the sinfulness of mankind and testified of the prophetic plan of the ages regarding salvation and our desperate need for it, the Messiah and Israel through various models as represented in the Tabernacle/Temple, the different sacrifices, the seven feasts, priestly duties and garb, etc.).

Abraham is also “the father of them all that believe” which of course would include Gentiles who express faith towards God just as he did when he himself was Gentile, from the land of Ur of the Chaldees.

Gal 3:9, 14
So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith
.
(Read from Gal. 3: 6 – 14, 29)

Rom 4:13
For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith
.

Abraham, who believed God (for a son He would give him, and a land for his son to inherit), and by faith was justified, had his faith tested by the LORD in Genesis chapter 22, for it was here that God required that Abraham sacrifice his son, Isaac, who was to be made heir according to the LORD’s promise.

How could such promises be fulfilled, if his son was dead? Abraham believed that the LORD would raise him from the dead so that the promises could then in fact be realized (Heb. 11: 12, 17-19) and because Abraham willingly offered up his son, and trusted God for the rest, the LORD made this astounding pronouncement (found in both Gen. 22: 15-18 and Heb. 11:12):

Gen 22:17-18
That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice
.

Note that God declares that He will multiply Abraham’s “seed” (plural form here in vs. 17) as “the stars of the heaven” and also as “the sand which is upon the sea shore”. Here we see in type the two kinds of people that will inherit the same blessings as Abraham by the same kind of faith: the church and Israel.

The church is promised no such earthly kingdom, but a heavenly one: “the stars of the heaven,” whereas Israel has been promised a domain on the Earth: “the sand on the seashore,” that will be realized when once Messiah arrives and establishes His reign in the land of Israel.

Both groups can claim Abraham as their father, both groups are justified by faith in the Word of God (for Israel in the context of the Second Coming, but also in every preceding generation [up to the establishment of the church, whereupon believing Jews then became members of the body of Christ; Gal. 3: 26-29] where God has always had a remnant of the children of Abraham that understood and believed God’s promises concerning Messiah; Romans 11: 4-5), both groups have a destiny (as outlined in Acts 15: 13 – 18, and Israel’s destiny is elaborated upon in this book of Romans, chapters 9 - 11); both groups are mutually distinctive from each other.

The church is not “spiritual Israel” even though we are “grafted in” as a “wild olive branch” to the olive tree that is Israel, that grafting is according to believing and saving faith in God’s Word (Rom. 11:16 -26), and does not make us one with Israel, but ‘siblings’ in a spiritual sense with spiritual Israel in that we are both children of Abraham through the “seed” of Abraham (singular form here in Rom. 4: 18; this is Christ Jesus Who is also “the seed of the woman” Gen. 3:15).

Rom 4:14-15
For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:

Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression
.

There are groups of people today who say that if Christians want to be obedient in all things to the LORD and therefore pleasing to Him, then they are obligated to keep the Law and acknowledge the feasts by celebrating them.

Yet the Word states clearly that “without faith it’s impossible to please” God (Heb. 11:6; and it doesn’t state anywhere else that faith plus the law is required, faith plus celebrating the feasts is required). Here in these verses above in Romans, it states that “faith is made void”, and the “promise made of none effect” and if heirs are “of the law” this can only work the wrath of God.

Where ever the Law is present, there is transgression, and where there is transgression there is by necessity, the wrath of the Holy God Who must judge such without exception.

Abraham’s very life is a testimony of faith, apart from the Law of Moses that didn’t even become revealed until some centuries later.

Rom 4:16-17
Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were
.

So salvation is provided for all, Gentiles and Jews: those outside of the Law and those that have been given the Law and Oracles of God (Rom. 3: 2): both are required to express faith in God and His grace through Jesus Christ, and thereby are accounted as children of Abraham as he is the “father of us all.” See – Acts 15:11; Romans 2: 4; 3:24; 5:15; 11:6; Eph. 1:7; 2:7; 1 Tim. 1:14; Titus 2:11; 3:7.

Rom 5:15-16
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification
.

Abraham believed God without seeing the promise before his eyes, but received it by faith, giving credence to His Word. We likewise walk by faith and not by sight (2 Cor. 5:7), accrediting to God His ability to “call (or summon) those things that are not as though they were” for this is He Who “created (bara’ – to make out of nothing) the heavens and the earth.”

Salvation is, for our part, a free gift (a gift is something you don’t work for, but receive at no charge to yourself; rather the giver of the gift has worked for its purchase and offers it from the heart of love. This is the essence of grace (unmerited favor) that is given to us freely by God through the LORD Jesus Christ. Remember this acronym:

G.RA.C.E. God’s (Riches of) Righteousness Attributed at Christ’s Expense.

Rom 4:18-21
Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.

And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sara's womb:

He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God;

And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform
.

The LORD is constantly challenging us in making a choice to believe that which we perceive with our senses or believe what He has declared in His Word.

For centuries Israel was non-existent as a nation, with no apparent hope of ever returning and yet there were those pastors and Bible scholars who, despite these appearances clung tenaciously to the Word of God. Despite the laughter and ridicule by skeptics, they insisted that the LORD would be bringing the Jewish people back into the land, prosper them, and make them into a great nation to which the Messiah would come and reign over as her King, just as the prophetic Scriptures indicated.

Even though there are those that deny Israel’s legitimacy in having a Divine purpose both now and in the near future (and we at TTUF are NOT among this group!), Israel is nonetheless back in the land, just as God’s Word declared and He will accomplish His purposes with her, and keep His covenants with them!

Abraham likewise believed God, despite his age (and that of his wife), despite the circumstances and obstacles; he accepted by faith the promise of God that he would not only have a son, but that his offspring through the “promised seed” would be as the stars of heaven and the sand of the seashore!

Such a hefty, weighty promise of tremendous volume, and yet Abraham didn’t “stagger” under the formidable weight of it! His faith in God’s Word, in He Who is Truth, was not weak but strong – and he was fully “persuaded” (an interesting word in the Greek that intimates to be entirely sure of something to the point that it affects the mind, and ergo one’s belief; see Rom. 8:38-39; 2 Tim. 1: 12; Heb. 11:13) that the One Who “promised” had the ability to “perform” (to bring forth fruit, to make, to work)!

We as saints can look into the Word of God and review the countless promises of God to those His children who are walking with Him, and believe God for them. Contrary to popular dogma, faith is not a power that we as Christians can use indiscriminately according to our own ‘spoken word’ or wishes; rather it is an implicit understanding, acknowledgment and trust in GOD’s WORD.

The notion that you “just have to have faith” is wrong; faith is a means to accessing the work of God: understanding His Word, appropriating His grace and salvation, pleasing the LORD by believing and obeying Him. Faith (or trust) in itself is useless as it must have an object to focus on, and to be effective that object must be able to accomplish and trustworthy of the faith invested in it.

If my house was on fire, and I picked up my phone to call the Fire Department for help, I would exhibit trust that they would come with all their vehicles and equipment and save me. Once done, I would not extol the power of my phone, and give thanks to it; it was merely an instrument by which I acquired the means to find help. I would rightly thank the Fire Fighters that risked their lives in confronting a deadly fire and saved my own life.

Faith is like a spiritual phone, and it would do no good to call a ‘party line’ and talk to ‘whoever might be out there’ but only a specific number, the One Who is Truth and Trustworthy, both omnipotent and omniscient, He Who is Love. We may be “fully persuaded that He Who promises to save any who call upon His Name, He is able to perform by saving, and saving to the uttermost (Heb. 7:25):

Rom 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Acts 16:31
And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house
.

And so we may conclude this chapter:

Rom 4:22-25
And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.

Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;

But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;

Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification
.

Had the LORD Jesus only died on the Cross, but didn’t rise from the dead, our salvation would not have been secured, as His resurrection is necessary in order to defeat death of the extraordinary kind: the second death by which our sins have separated us from our Creator God, the Author of all Life and in which state the damned will be everlastingly condemned in gehenna.

Knowing that He has been raised from the dead, sin and death have been defeated, hell avoided, and righteousness imputed to us along with clean hearts acceptable as habitations of the Holy Spirit, granting us eternal life!

For a detailed treatment of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ and its vital importance to Christian doctrine and life, please visit the following articles FROM the MIND of FIRE The Most Important Chapter of the Bible, Part I

The Most Important Chapter of the Bible, Part II

Abraham is discussed in the Epistle to the Hebrews as well (whose author I believe to be Paul), and in that passage, the writer expounds on his faith regarding the sacrifice of Isaac: Heb. 11: 8 –12, 17 – 19.

It’s interesting to me that the two high points of the faith of Abraham involved the promise of the coming son and then in his being raised from the dead; here we see a perfect parallel to the Christian who expresses faith in the Son of God Who is also the Son of man Who came to this world to declare the Gospel and fulfill this new covenant in us (Gentiles for now, for the Jews later when He arrives the second time), and Who was raised from the dead for our justification.

May we indeed express “like faith” as Abraham as true children in his enormous family, and share the blessing of “the seed of Abraham” Jesus Christ with those that do not yet know Him as LORD and Savior!

This concludes Chapter Four of Romans, but not the treatment of the doctrine of justification as explained here by Paul the apostle. He continues in this doctrine through out chapter Five and upon its conclusion, he then addresses that aspect of salvation that deals with sanctification.

Just as justification brings victory over the penalty of sin (death and hell), so likewise sanctification brings to us who are the church, victory over the power of sin (such power would spell utter defeat in our walks with the LORD if not dealt with) and this doctrine is addressed in Chapters Six through Eight!

May the LORD continue to bless and edify you in His Word by His Spirit!
Read more!

The Battle for the Bible – Does Inerrancy and Infallibility Really Matter?


 by A.M. Kisly

Part 1 – Inerrancy an Evangelical Problem

I recently purchased a copy of The Battle For The Bible by “Dr. Harold Lindsell. It is an old publication, originally published in 1976, yet its documentation is extremely important in this present church age as we are witnessing the abandonment of the essentially orthodox view of Scripture.

It is because I believe strongly that the Bible is the Foundation upon which we as Christian’s stand that I write the introduction to this next series of articles entitled, The Battle for the Bible – Does Inerrancy and Infallibility Really Matter? This series will be heavily based upon Dr. Lindsell’s expertise and research covered in this book, and of course upon the Scriptures themselves. Though many do not distinguish between the words Inerrancy and Infallibility…there is a slight difference. Dr. Lindsell uses the words interchangeably…while others tend to distinguish between them.

Paul Smith offers this explanation, and I hope that it will satisfy all:

“The Bible is infallible, meaning it does not deceive. It means the Bible will never deceive us in matters of faith. In spiritual matters it is trustworthy. It has absolute authority and will never lead us astray. However “infallible” as currently used, neglects to tell us something about the Bible. Is the Bible historically accurate? Did the events of the Bible really happen? This is where the word Inerrancy comes to play. This word means that the Bible does not make a statement contrary to fact…not only in matters of faith….but also in all other matters. Today while many of the matters under attack are the historical and scientific accuracy of the Bible, the terms used must be clarified.” I will use both so as not to confuse anyone.

A few months ago I posted a book review on, New Evangelicalism, by Paul Smith. In it, Paul recommended Dr. Lindsell’s book for further research into the question of Bible inerrancy. Before we get started on the subject matter though, for those not familiar with Dr. Lindsell, a brief biographical sketch of his life and work is as follows:

Dr. Harold Lindsell (1913-1998) began his career at Columbia Bible College, Columbia S.C. as professor of history of missions from 1942-44. He was ordained a Baptist minister in 1944 and served as professor of missions and church history, 1944-47 at Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, Chicago, Ill. From 1947- 1964, he taught at Fuller Theological Seminary as professor of missions, Dean of the Faculty, and Vice President. He was Associate Editor of Christianity Today from 1964 -1967 and professor of Bible at Wheaton College from 1967-68. He returned to Christianity Today as Editor from 1968- 1978. He also taught at Simon Greenleaf School of Law. He wrote and edited more than twenty books including The Battle for the Bible, The Bible in Balance, Free Enterprise: A Judeo-Christian Defense, Armageddon Spectre, The New Paganism, and The Holy Spirit in the Latter Days. He also served as editor for the Harper Study Bible, Tyndale Words of God for Every Day, and The Everyday Pocket Bible.

Does what we believe about the Bible really matter? Is the Bible really Divinely Inspired, Inerrant, Infallible and the Absolute Authority in all truth? For me, the answer is YES! ABSOLUTELY! For others who are questioning or even denying, we shall endeavor to convince and assure them that God’s Word is absolutely trustworthy.

What we believe about the Bible matters immensely because Truth Really Matters. In today’s age truth is hard to come by, which is part of the problem. Multitudes have been accommodating lies for decades. It has unfortunately become a way of life in our culture, too many today believe it is "normal" to tell lies, and be deceived by lies. Sad, but true! When one becomes accustomed to lies, discernment is dulled and truth has been lost to all. Since God is the author of all truth, and Satan the Father of lies, shouldn’t we love truth, believe truth, and follow hard after truth? But how can we do that when we doubt even the source of all truth, and His written word to us?

After many debates with other believers, biblical scholars and leaders in the past couple of years over portions of scripture that are discarded as fictional stories, this issue has laid heavy on my heart.

In an article written by Albert Mohler, he discusses this battle over the inerrancy of Scripture. In fact, he claims (and I agree) that there seems to be a full blown effort to forge an evangelical identity apart from the claim that the Bible is totally truthful and without error.

Dr. Mohler states the following, “Recently, Professor Peter Enns, formerly of Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, has argued that the biblical authors clearly erred. He has argued that Paul, for example, was clearly wrong in assuming the historicity of Adam. In Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament, published in 2005, he presented an argument for an “incarnational” model of biblical inspiration and authority. But in this rendering, incarnation — affirming the human dimension of Scripture — means accepting some necessary degree of error.”

(This is the same debate myself, my sister, a homeschool mom, and many others engaged in with Dr. Enns after a confrontation with Dr. Ken Ham from the Institute for Creation Research. Dr. Enns was one of the speakers for their annual Homeschool Convention.)
 
Dr. Mohler goes on to say, “This argument is taken to the next step by Kenton L. Sparks in his 2008 book, God’s Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Biblical Scholarship. Sparks, who teaches at Eastern University, argues that it is nothing less than intellectually disastrous for evangelicals to claim that the Bible is without error.

His arguments, also serialized and summarized in a series of articles, are amazingly candid. He asserts that Evangelicalism has “painted itself into an intellectual corner” by claiming the inerrancy of Scripture. The movement is now in an “intellectual cul-de-sac,” he laments, because we have “crossed an evidential threshold that makes it intellectually unsuitable to defend some of the standard dogmas of the conservative evangelical tradition.” And, make no mistake; inerrancy is the central dogma he would have us let go."

Of course there is no doubt that Sparks fully understands the evangelical doctrine of biblical inerrancy, but declares it “intellectually disastrous”.

Mohler reveals that the articles written by Sparks appear at the BioLogos Web site. If you have kept up on all the homeschool chatter this past year, it has been made clear that BioLogos would like to move evangelicals toward a full embrace of evolutionary theory….of course Biblical inerrancy presents a huge obstacle towards that end. Sparks claims, that the “evidential threshold” has been crossed, and the Bible has come up short. The biblical writers were simply trapped within the limits of their own ancient cosmology and observations.

Sparks further argues that the Bible presents immoral teachings, citing “biblical texts that strike us as down-right sinister or evil.” Sparks concludes that the Bible “exhibits all the telltale signs of having been written by finite, fallen human beings who erred in the ways that human beings usually err.”

Shocking, isn’t it? Sparks takes this deviancy once step further, he further suggests that Jesus “was a finite person who grew up in Palestine.” and proposes that Jesus made routine errors of fact.
 
The incarnational model of inspiration and biblical authority that both Peter Enns and Kenton Sparks argue for is not new among evangelicals, it's a battle that has been going on for years. However, Mr. Sparks, takes the argument much further, his model implicates Jesus. He suggests in an article called 'After Inerrancy', that  Jesus “was a finite person who grew up in Palestine...If Jesus as a finite human being erred from time to time, there is no reason at all to suppose that Moses, Paul, [and/or] John wrote Scripture without error."  What is outrageous to me is that Mr. Sparks affirms his belief in the historic Christian creeds and “traditional Christian orthodoxy,”  We will go into further detail about the confusion of those like Mr. Sparks who claim orthodoxy, yet deny inerrancy a bit later.

Dr. Mohler concludes with these comments, “That is a breath-taking assumption, to say the very least. But, even in its shocking audacity, it serves to reveal the clear logic of the new battle-lines over biblical inerrancy. We now confront open calls to accept and affirm that there are indeed errors in the Bible. It is demanded that we accept the fact that the human authors of the Bible often erred because of their limited knowledge and erroneous assumptions about reality. We must, it is argued, abandon the claim that the Bible is a consistent whole. Rather, we are told to accept the claims that the human authors of Scripture were just plain wrong in some texts — even in texts that define God and his ways. We are told that some texts are just “down-right sinister or evil. The rejection of biblical inerrancy is bound up with a view of God that is, in the end, fatal for Christian orthodoxy. We are entering a new phase in the battle over the Bible’s truthfulness and authority.”

The question of Infallibility and Inerrancy becomes more urgent. Can the Bible be trusted as the absolute infallible and inerrant Word of God? For me the matter is settled, but as you can see there is a battle going on, we must stand firmly upon God’s truth.

Dr. Lindsell supports the historic view of an infallible and inerrant Bible in his book which has been the longstanding tradition of fundamentalists and evangelicals for many years. Because of the more recent departure from this viewpoint from the new-evangelical revisionists, the change is now widespread in evangelical denominations, Christian colleges, theological seminaries, publishing houses and learned societies.

Before we go much further, Dr. Lindsell describes three schools of thought with regards to the Bible’s trustworthiness:

The first is that the Bible is not at all trustworthy. If this answer is correct, then Christianity stands upon a false foundation. Anyone who professes a faith founded on a source that cannot be trusted is a fool, is naïve, or is deluded. Certainly no thinking or honest person would embrace, recommend, or propagate a religion based on what he knows to be untrue.
 
The second is that the Bible can be trusted as truthful in all its parts. By this I mean that the Bible is infallible and inerrant. It communicates religious truth, not religious error. Further, whatever it communicates is to be trusted and can be relied upon as being true. The Bible is not a textbook on chemistry, astronomy, philosophy or medicine. But when it speaks on matters having to do with these or any other subjects, the Bible does not lie to us. It does not contain error of any kind. Thus, the Bible, if true in all its parts, cannot possibly teach that the earth is flat, that two and two make five, or that events happened at times other than we know they did. The Bible could not, if it is trustworthy, say the Julius Caesar was emperor when Jesus was crucified, or that Caesar Augustus perpetrated the sack of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. If it did these things, it then would be conveying information to us that is palpably false.

The Third and last possibility is that the Bible contains some truth and some error (this is the view of many of our new evangelicals). Part of what it says can be relied upon, and some of it must be regarded as false. In other words, the Bible is neither completely trustworthy, nor completely false. The proportion of the material that is truthful may be greater in volume than that which is untrue. But wholly apart from the proportion of that which is truthful and of that which is in error, the Bible is a mixture of both. It makes no difference whatever that the false information may have come about due to ignorance, carelessness, or any other reason. Indeed, no one need presume that any part containing error was introduced deliberately.

Of course we must understand that there is a wide diversity among those who believe in a fallible Bible. Some like Dr. Enns hold to errancy that does not go beyond science and history (which in my opinion is bad enough). However there are others like Prof. Sparks who are rejecting some of the basic doctrines of the Christian faith. Do you see the danger?

This is the main crux of the book, says Dr. Lindsell, to understand and to be made aware of what is happening, why it has happened, what the prospects are in the near future for further changes, and what history teaches us about the ultimate outcome when Christians cease to believe in an infallible, inerrant Bible.

We must remember that the Bible originated in the mind of God, not in the mind of man and thus means a great deal more. Its inspiration is not the same as the inspiration of a great novelist, artist or musician. Divine inspiration is not derived by “human genius” as many postmodernists suppose. The Bible's authority is not derived from reason. Though we believe the Bible to be reasonable, it is because it is the Word of Him Who is the source of all reason! Our reason needs to be approved by the Bible and not the Bible by our reason. Today it’s as if some study the Bible to prove to God and man that is full of error and cannot be trusted and by doing so they have completely missed the mark. Yet in 2 Timothy 2:15 we are exhorted to, “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” Also, Romans 12:2 comes to mind, that we are transformed by the renewing of our minds.

The attitude that we have toward the trustworthiness of Scripture determines our later position, not only on faith, but also on practice. The evidence that those who surrender the doctrine of inerrancy inevitably move away from orthodoxy is indisputable.

2 Timothy 3:16 tells us, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:”

The word inspiration here actually means “outbreathed” (By God). In Romans 3:2, Paul speaks of Scripture as “the very words of God”. Even more significant, the apostles and our Lord Himself quoted the Old Testament-not merely as the counsel of a particular patriarch or prophet, but as the counsel of God given through the writers.”

In these days when theological definitions are disfavored and human speculation has attempted to eclipse divine revelation it is essential that we define what we mean when we say the Bible is the Inspired Word of God.

So here goes, I believe the Inspired Word of God to be of divine authority, completely infallible, inerrant, and absolutely sufficient, not just some of it…BUT ALL OF IT!

You see, we can think whatever we want about a great number of things, as it really doesn’t matter much in the grand scheme of things. But when it comes to the Bible, what we believe about it affects our understanding of the fundamentals of the Christian faith, it also affects our eternal destiny, and that matters a great deal.

Does a poisoned well bring forth clean water? You may think this an absurd question, but how is that any different than suggesting that God's Word is full of errors, but we can still trust it enough to believe on Him.

As I have stated, in the past couple of years I have noticed an all out attack upon the authority and inerrancy of the Scriptures. Over and over again, I have been challenged by those who reject the Bible as the final authority in all matters that concern mankind. The most troubling fact of all is that the attacks are coming from among the evangelicals once counted on as those who hold to orthodox views. Unfortunately, in a vain attempt at making the church more relevant to this postmodern world, Church leaders have deviated from biblical inerrancy thus corrupting the word of God and the doctrines of the Church. It is in my opinion the biggest problem facing the modern evangelical church. When discussing this with James, co-writer for T.T.U.F., we both agree that being labeled anything other than Christian these days, can be challenging at best. Though I/we feel the need to distance ourselves from the new evangelicals today, perhaps the term ‘separatist’ fits us better. Separating from the world and its sinful proclivities, as well as the liberal theology of today, while maintaining orthodoxy is becoming extremely unpopular amongst those who consider themselves part of ‘mainstream’ Christianity. Yes, I think ‘separatist’ fits us better.

The Ethical Dilemma

Dr. Lindsell goes on to explore the ethical dilemma of holding an errant view, while at the same time continuing to claim orthodoxy. 

One of the many problems among those who have swung from an infallible to a fallible Bible face an ethical dilemma of subscribing to what they no longer believe. Integrity goes out the window. They operate within creeds or confessions of faith that affirm an infallible Scripture, yet deny it publicly through their teaching and practice. Add to this the institutions, publishing houses and denominations that insist that their theological stand remains with the infallibility and inerrancy of Scripture, but the fact remains that they are failing miserably in practice. Today, Publishing houses seem to be printing every wind of doctrine, heresy and newest perversion of the Bible…where is their stand for biblical inerrancy and truth? Why not clarify where they stand and publicly make it known? To give the impression that they stand on the old truths, when in fact the reality is, they really don’t, is dishonest.

A Watershed Question

Is the Bible fully or partially trustworthy is absolutely a watershed question. It is a critical point that draws a line in the sand. The marking of a division or a change of course; a turning point which at some point further down the road creates such a gap that cannot be closed.

For instance, Dr.  Lindsell explains, many that don’t believe in an infallible Scripture may still believe in the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the vicarious atonement, physical resurrection, and His second coming. These are essential doctrines of the Christian faith and many argue that this issue of infallibility a secondary issue. The same argument has been made over modern Bible versions. Here’s the problem, based on past history, what “seems” like a small difference of opinion at this point later becomes an enormous gulf later on. The differences will increase as we see other doctrines discarded with the doctrine of infallibility. You see, once infallibility is abandoned, it opens the door to further departures from the faith.

Dr. Lindsell states, “Once errancy enters an institution, it does not simply become one of several options. It quickly becomes the regnant view and infallibility loses its foothold until at last it is silenced effectively. When one surveys the current scene in places where errancy has gotten a grip, it soon becomes obvious that there are few champions of inerrancy ready or willing to challenge the new reality.” Without such a challenge to those opposing inerrancy, the case can be made in such a way that the unlearned and unsophisticated will absolutely fall for it…hook, line and sinker!

Does what we believe about the Bible matter? Absolutely! The terrible results of the dethronement of the absolute authority, infallibility, inerrancy, and sufficiency of the Bible can clearly be seen all around us today. How many institutions and denominations have gone astray? How many will follow them?

Are we not reaping the harvest of the sowing of modernism? In a postmodern world, we see the end result of those seeds. The heresies spread throughout the evangelical church, the compromise with new age, humanism, universalism, the emergent movement, the new apostolic reformation and the ecumenical nightmare can be plainly seen. A deviation from what the Bible truly is, it’s Author, its authority, sufficiency and infallibility has created for us an unrecognizable gospel with a perverted message, and a church that has lost its effectiveness in this lost world.

Embracing errancy has led to and will continue to lead to disaster. Dr. Lindsell describes that congregations have gone to sleep, it has produced spiritual sloth and decay…and by the looks of it has led many to apostasy. These are indeed some of the evil consequences of adhering to errancy.

A perfect example of this is the Unitarian Universalist denomination. The underlying fact in their departure from orthodoxy was their disbelief in the infallibility of the Scripture. Fact is that in the early nineteenth century, the differences between the Unitarians and the orthodox didn’t appear to be so great…but today, there is a profound difference. Many Unitarians are atheists; humanists…even Buddhists….hello? The doctrines of sin and hell have disappeared. The doctrine of the trinity denied. The gospel is not preached to the lost, nor is the Bible taught in their pulpits. They are completely apostate.

I must caution that the departure from an infallible Scripture does not necessarily mean that all have fallen into some apostate religion. However, I honestly believe it is significant and dangerous to the church because it deviates from sound truth. If for instance one denies the biblical flood, the creation account, if Adam and Eve were real people or fictional characters, one begins to question all of the bible, the history, the prophetic scriptures and even the gospel of salvation. A denial of the creation account would endorse evolution, wherein death and dying was common place for hundreds of millions of years and thus trivialize the account of the fall of man into 'sin' and subsequently, death, and relegating such to mere 'fable' which would dismiss the need for the Gospel, for the Cross, for the atonement by Jesus Christ for the sins of the world! As we have seen from Dr. Mohler’s article that this mindset is coming out of today’s seminaries. Further, it is this mindset now teaching the next generation of seminary students and publishing curriculum for Christian homeschoolers.

Leaders who deny the inerrancy and infallibility of scripture fail to teach expositionally. By expositionally, I mean preaching in such a way that the meaning of the Bible passage is presented entirely and exactly as it was intended by God.

Walter Kaiser stated, “It is no secret that Christ's Church is not at all in good health in many places of the world. She has been languishing because she has been fed, as the current line has it, "junk food"; all kinds of artificial preservatives and all sorts of unnatural substitutes have been served up to her. As a result, theological and Biblical malnutrition has afflicted the very generation that has taken such giant steps to make sure its physical health is not damaged by using foods or products that are carcinogenic or otherwise harmful to their physical bodies. Simultaneously a worldwide spiritual famine resulting from the absence of any genuine publication of the Word of God (Amos 8:11) continues to run wild and almost unabated in most quarters of the Church.”

If we believe that "all Scripture is inspired by God" and inerrant, must we not be equally committed to the reality that it is "profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work"? Should not that magnificent truth determine how we preach?
 
Speaking Out

There is a a fierce battle raging today which centers on the Bible’s trustworthiness. Is the Bible infallible and inerrant? Many evangelicals say yes to varying degrees. Should we ignore the fact that so many are now falling into the camp which deny the infallibility and inerrancy of the Bible?  As Dr. Lindsell and others point out, when looking from a historical perspective it cannot be denied that the Christian church for over 2,000 years has unanimously agreed that the Word of God is completely trustworthy in its fullness. So the question is, what has changed? When did it change and why? We will seek out the answers to these questions in the continuation of this series of articles. Dr. Lindsell examines the evidences, puts forth the arguments, and illustrates the opinions by specific examples to make the case as impregnable as possible.

I will conclude with the following thoughts:

The writers of the Bible were men under the influence of the Holy Spirit and who were inspired by God to write the inerrant Word of God.
 
The apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” 2 Timothy 3:16-17

Peter wrote, “We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” 2 Peter 1:19-21

God, our Creator, has revealed Himself, and proven Himself by His own influence to mankind, that we might believe! If His Word is questioned, His Authority is questioned, His messaged is then questioned…If everything is questionable, untrustworthy and unreliable, let me ask you, who will believe?
 
We read in the book of John, “And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.” John 20:30-31
 
God’s purpose for giving us the His Word, is so that we would believe, trust and coming to the saving knowledge of His Son Jesus. He reveals Himself to us, His great character, His ability, His power, grace, righteousness and a million other things. If this is indeed His purpose let me ask you this, would God communicate error to us?
 
Dr. Ian Paisley once said, “To reject the Bible is to reject the God of the Bible. To reject God is to reject the Commandments of God. To reject the Commandments of God is to reject the Authority of Heaven. To reject the authority of heaven is to accept the Anarchy of Hell.”

Certainly the hour is late, yet it is never too late to get back to the Bible. A rediscovery of the Word of God brought about the glorious Reformation of four-hundred years ago, men like Luther, Tyndale and many, many others who believed that the fight for the Bible and the gospel message was more valuable than their very lives. How much more do we need His Word in these final hours?

The power of the Bible is just as potent today in the hands of God’s faithful servants. "
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." Hebrews 4:12
 

It is my prayer that all of God’s Word will rule our hearts, and minds, and homes; and not the lofty thoughts of man.  May the Lord bless you and may His unfailing promises be yours and mine as we wait for His return.


Read more!

Saturday, October 8, 2011

The TRANSLATION HOME


~~ By James Fire, 10/2011

The clarion call on silver trumps sound,
Saints asleep and quick ascend from the ground.
Leaving a fallen world, their joy abounds,
Ascending high, angelic greetings found.

Freedom from sin aged flesh, and garbed anew,
Lo, pillars of peace in heavenly hue;
Hosts of winged glory, bright swords imbue;
the pilgrim’s blessed home, the Kingdom true.

Glorious joy erupts from awe-filled hearts,
Beholding saintly friends from finish to start;
Reunion of Father’s family, ne’er to part,
Only then to see fondest cry of our heart:

Forth He comes, regal in His Royal bearing,
Flanked by Cherubim, with wings a’ flaring.
The LORD, the LAMB, the LIGHT of GOD standing:
With Almighty, scarred arms extended and sharing –

Joy unspeakable, full of glory o’erflowing;
Holy Son’s Love enshrined in glorified frame,
Partaking of such, yet ever, ever growing:
in the worshipful Bride’s heart, born of His Name.

Scented in sacredness, Heavenly domain;
Rescued from tears, from scars, from fears and pain,
Delighting in rest, and abundance of peace;
Songs of deliverance which shall never cease.

Around the Throne shall the praises lavish be,
For ages long the grace of the LORD we’ll see,
Bounding e’er upwards, e’er worshipful ecstasy;
For Worthy, Worthy, O Worthy the LAMB is HE!

Home we hope for, for home we weep and do pray,
Be of good cheer, for in this world we shall not stay!
We shine the Light of Gospel Call, to the lost we say:
Look to the Cross, the empty tomb and for that Day,

For the LORD shall come with a shout, and steal His Bride away!


1 Thess 4:16
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God . . .

Rev 7:11-12
And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four beasts, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshipped God,
Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen.

Dedicated to the HOLY LORD JESUS CHRIST, HE Who is WORTHY of The HIGHEST WORSHIP ETERNALLY!

1 Tim 1:17
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen
. Read more!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
ReferenceTagging.tag();